Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Many thanks to José Luis Tallón for proposing to bake cookies, but there
> are already enough cookers in Spain.
Thank you for organizing this all along, and thanks to *all*
contributors, whether they fixed their bugs or not, for helping make a
better free OS for everyone.
kies.
Thanks very much, Josselin, for creating and driving an international
Debian bug sprint for fun and cookies. What a great and positive way
to encourage both competition and collaboration. I hope to see more of
these!
--
\ “Anyone who puts a small gloss on [a] fund
Following the previous announcement and corrections I received, I
dispatched cookie assignments using the best available technology [0].
Cookies sent to indisputable winners:
* Yves-Alexis Perez will receive cookies from Frank Lin Piat
* Stefano Zacchiroli will receive cookies from mys
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:39:47 am John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > >=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we
> > > > gonna make another one? :)
>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:39 AM, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>> But ... *who* is gonna want the aussie beer? :)
>
> Anybody that has had Victoria Bitter before.
I hope that was sarcasm!
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > >=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
> > > make another one? :)
> >
> > Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package wit
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
> > make another one? :)
>
> Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
> brew from the people
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:32:37 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:22:57AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > In Sicily we *do* have local breweries ;)
>
> WOW o_O. In Bologna I was aware of only one :(
>
> So you just have to *loose* the forthcoming competition and send beer
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:22:57AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> In Sicily we *do* have local breweries ;)
WOW o_O. In Bologna I was aware of only one :(
So you just have to *loose* the forthcoming competition and send beer
to everybody :-P
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ Po
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:21:07 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the
> > local brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm
> > offering German bee
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paul Wise (au) for fixing #479607 (still to be uploaded)
:D cookies :D
On the serious side, as I wrote in the bug report, I'm not as familiar
with debconf and maintainer scripts as I should be in order to fix
t
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Why not, but note that local breweries are not that common around the
> world as they are (IIRC) in Germany. At least they weren't that common
> in Italy, but that's compensated by home-made liquors usually :) So
> let's generalize it to whatever liquid containing alc
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the
> local brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm
> offering German beer to five winners, just as Joss did for cookies.
Why not, but note th
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
> make another one? :)
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm offering
German beer to five winners, j
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success.
^^^
this
I think it was a great success, it has proven that fun/game is a good
motivation among hackers, and that initiatives like this should be
done m
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The following people deserve a honorable mention for dealing with their
> bugs.
> * Gaudenz Steinlin for proposing approaches for #488669 (this is
> still work in progress)
Oh thanks for the honorable mention. I wi
On 31/10/08 at 13:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The following people definitely deserve cookies. They provided patches
> for long-standing RC issues which are all fixed or soon to be.
> * Lucas Nussbaum (fr) and Emmanuel Bouthenot (fr) for working
> together on #501800/#496954
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> * Sean Finney (us) for downgrading #501574 and fixing #267040
i'm in .se, actually :)
sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joss wrote:
>
>The following people failed to fix the bugs they were assigned, but the
>issues were either too complex or already tackled by other people. They
>are encouraged to contribute to the baking effort, still!
> * Josselin Mouette (fr) for not fixing the hppa kernel (I will
>b
Hi folks,
the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success. A
success since a number of RC bugs were fixed, but mitigated by the small
number of players.
I’d like to thank all players for their contributions. The game was not
really fair since some issues were much easier to deal
On 30/10/08 at 13:50 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
> > update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
> > faster than I file them anyway ;)
> WTF? Packa
On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
> update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
> faster than I file them anyway ;)
WTF? Packages other than inetd daemons MUST NOT depend on update-inetd
The Bug Sprint has just started!
We have 27 players who registered to win cookies.
The list of players and the bug they are affected is available at the
usual place:
http://wiki.debian.org/BugSprint
Thanks for your contribution, and good luck in the game
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> If everything goes the way I want it to be, it won't be just lucas the one
>> filing reports: I asked lucas if he could do the remove/purge test in lenny
>
> I'll do that.
Thanks :)
>
>> and
>> the full install/
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
> >> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
> >> >
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
>> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
>> > does not count in the great cookie contest?
>>
>> Of course it
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:50:59AM -0500]:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :)
>
> Definitely! Please add it to the rules :)
Can Lucas be bribed with cookies? I always noticed
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
> update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
> faster than I file them anyway ;)
You mean like this one?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On 21/10/08 at 14:11 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
> > > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
> > > does not count in the great cookie
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> we are currently very close to release lenny which is most likely going
> to be absolutely awesome.
>
> However, there are currently around 100 RC bugs remaining
Apologies if this has already been brought up.
Using the number RC bugs that a present in lenny and sid is
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :)
Definitely! Please add it to the rules :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
> > does not count in the great cookie contest?
>
> Of course it does count; added to the rules
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
> So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
> does not count in the great cookie contest?
Of course it does count; added to the rules in the wiki page.
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your pr
At Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:43:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote
> Fixing a RC bug means either of:
> * Uploading a NMU that fixes the bug to unstable.
> * Convincing, with a mail that details the rationale, a release
> manager to tag the bug lenny-ignore.
> * Convincing, in
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
> people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
> idea is:
> 122 developers × 5 days = 122 RC bugs fixed
>
> The rules are
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Would using a gnuherds.org pledge on RC bugs be useful here? Then
> people can donate money to get RC bugs fixed in debian, and people who
> fix the bug can claim the money. The claims and pledges would be open,
> which I think is important.
>
> I u
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:55:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 07:50:10PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
> > 14:04, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>
> > > The rules are : at the end
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 07:50:10PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
> 14:04, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> > The rules are : at the end of a 5-day period, the bug you are assigned
> > must be closed in unstabl
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Would using a gnuherds.org pledge on RC bugs be useful here? Then
> people can donate money to get RC bugs fixed in debian, and people who
> fix the bug can claim the money. The claims and pledges would be open,
> which I think is important.
> I understand there could be
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> All we need is 122 skilled developers willing to sign in this contract
> (with their blood).
>
> Does it sound like a realistic idea? If people agree with it, I’ll setup
> a wiki page to collect the volunteer list and send an anno
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
14:04, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> The rules are : at the end of a 5-day period, the bug you are assigned
> must be closed in unstable or have a lenny-ignore tag. Otherwise this is
> a free-for-all.
The d
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
> unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
>
> However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
> people seem to lose focus on this
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
> unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
>
> However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
> people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the re
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days = 1
45 matches
Mail list logo
