Osamu Aoki writes:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:07:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I would contact Heimdal upstream and ask if they'd be willing to change
>> the name of the binary, given that it's a relatively new program and is
>> much more recent than the other package.
> There are so many
Hi,
Wait a moment ... what about removing kcc package. (See below)
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:07:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij writes:
> > I think it would be reasonable for Heimdal to rename kcc to kcc.heimdal
> > or something like that.
This is, as I understand, our stand
Jelmer Vernooij writes:
> Thanks for bringing this up.
> I think it would be reasonable for Heimdal to rename kcc to kcc.heimdal
> or something like that.
> Heimdal upstream has been shipping kcc since 2010, but we haven't
> included it in Debian before, so that probably causes the least upgrad
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 18:41 +, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> These packages do not remotely have the same functionality:
> kcc: Kanji code filter
> heimdal-clients: Heimdal Kerberos - clients
>
> kcc appears to have shipped /usr/bin/kcc approximately since 1997.
>
> heimdal-clients introduced /usr/
Hi devel,
These packages do not remotely have the same functionality:
kcc: Kanji code filter
heimdal-clients: Heimdal Kerberos - clients
kcc appears to have shipped /usr/bin/kcc approximately since 1997.
heimdal-clients introduced /usr/bin/kcc in September 2011 and #644138
was filed shortly the
5 matches
Mail list logo
