On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:57:57PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> And it doesn't matter for you either, because I reassigned the bug to
> perl-base. If you continue to argue and say that it is not a bug
> (somewhere; anywhere) that I can't upgrade from stable to unstable I
> will ignore your messages.
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, xsdg wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this is the correct answer, but do you have the
>> newest apt, apt-utils, debconf, debconf-utils, and dpkg
>> installed on that box?
Steve> Does that really a
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> Now, hold my hand. Your installed perl-base looks like
Jason> this:
The installed stuff is not relevant. There is nothing wrong with my
existing setup. apt-get is happy with it as is. However it won't let
me upgrade.
1.
On 1 May 2001, Brian May wrote:
> Jason> No, it means you can't do this specific situation you asked
> Jason> for, you said dist-upgrade works, so you can in fact
> Jason> upgrade to unstable!
>
> I don't recall saying that. If so, I did, I am sorry, I must have been
> confused at t
reassign 95801 perl-base
thanks
To restate this bug report in simple terms:
It is simply not possible to install perl-base[1] from unstable as it
conflicts with perl-5.004-base[2] which is a required package in
stable, and no longer exists in unstable[3].
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL
On 1 May 2001, Brian May wrote:
> > "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jason> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Brian May wrote:
>
> >> WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This
> >> should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
>
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, xsdg wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the correct answer, but do
> you have the newest apt, apt-utils, debconf,
> debconf-utils, and dpkg installed on that box?
Does that really address the problem? A user upgrading from potato to woody
once woody is released will also not h
I'm not sure if this is the correct answer, but do
you have the newest apt, apt-utils, debconf,
debconf-utils, and dpkg installed on that box?
--xsdg
--
___
/ Sun Microsystems. We put the dot in ./exploit \
\
reopen 95801
thanks
(note: skip to "rehash of problem" to see what this problem is all
about. I am writing this to debian-devel, because I consider this a
serious problem which shouldn't be ignored).
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Br
9 matches
Mail list logo
