Re: Bug#95579: dpkg-parsechangelog (Re: NEWS.Debian support is here)

2003-07-08 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:46:49PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > This change wouldn't break the format or anything; it would only add some > > additional text to the Changes: field. Surely no programs depend on the > > _content_ of that field, do they? >

Re: Bug#95579: dpkg-parsechangelog (Re: NEWS.Debian support is here)

2003-07-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:11:46PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > I filed a wishlist bug about this quite a long time ago (#95579), but > > > got no response. > > > > Hmm, maybe a library(perl) that gives a