On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 09:51:03PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> we created the metapackage for upgrades and convenience.
> Why not retire the gnome-games metapackage if it was only for upgrades?
Sorry, I was unclear in my original email, but
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Why not retire the gnome-games metapackage if it was only for upgrades?
> As far as I can see it, the real package is in wheezy, and since jessie
> we have the transitional one. Same will apply for stretch. And for buster
> you can safely drop
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 08:56:39AM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Why not retire the gnome-games metapackage if it was only for upgrades?
> As far as I can see it, the real package is in wheezy, and since jessie
> we have the transitional one. Same will apply for stretch. And for buster
> you can saf
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 09:51:03PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> The upstream project is named gnome-games which conflicts with the
> Debian metapackage gnome-games. gnome-games originally was the name of
> the collection of GNOME casual games released together and managed in
> the same repo. W
4 matches
Mail list logo
