On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:13:40PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 octobre 2015 17:45 +0200, Jakub Wilk :
> > Another possibility is to refrain from fixing the bug, and let unlucky
> > users clean their systems themselves.
>
> I think that's the best solution. All the more if the faulty pack
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 03:49:31PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The only way to hand a file (any file) over to another package is by way of
> > 'Replaces:', *without* the Conflicts: and Provides:.
> >
> > Since this is a single
On 2015-10-12, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Because of a latent bug in debian/rules, pbuilder_0.217 shipped multiple
> files that belonged to pbuilder-uml, including
> /etc/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml.conf. This is bug #800416, which was promptly
> fixed in pbuilder_0.218. The faulty package was only in unsta
❦ 12 octobre 2015 17:45 +0200, Jakub Wilk :
> I'd suggest to do something very simple instead:
> In pbuilder's postinst, if pbuilder-uml status is not-installed,
> simply rm -f /etc/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml.conf.
If for some reason, a user has put a file with this exact same name
here, it would be
As I understand it, this is what happened:
src:pbuilder builds two binary packages: pbuilder and pbuilder-uml.
pbuilder-uml depends on pbuilder.
pbuilder suggests pbuilder-uml.
pbuilder-uml ships /etc/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml.conf.
pbuilder is of course not supposed to ship the same conffile.
Beca
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The only way to hand a file (any file) over to another package is by way of
> 'Replaces:', *without* the Conflicts: and Provides:.
>
> Since this is a single packaga version, you could put the file in pbuilder-uml
> and have that '
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:30:28PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hi fellows debian-devel@ lurkers!
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:03:46PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles prope
Hi fellows debian-devel@ lurkers!
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:03:46PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
> > Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by dh_ins
8 matches
Mail list logo
