> Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
>
> I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still
> working on it?
> I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it
> impossible to distribute the binary?
>
Yes,
I am currently working on profanity package. Libstroph
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:32:05PM +0200, Stefano Rossi wrote:
> Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
>
> I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still
> working on it?
> I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it
> impossible to distribute the binary?
Op
Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still working
on it?
I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it impossible
to distribute the binary?
Thank you both,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@li
On 28 April 2014 22:23, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>> Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of
>> OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is
>> preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can tak
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of
> OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is
> preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example:
No, please use a more secu
At Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:22:59 +0200,
Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>
> > Dariusz Dwornikowski writes:
> >
> > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> > >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
> > >>
> > >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
> >
> > > Could Yo
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> > >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
> > >>
> > >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
> >
> > > Could You elaborate on that ? Why would open
> Dariusz Dwornikowski writes:
>
> >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
> >>
> >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
>
> > Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
> > distributable ?
>
Dariusz Dwornikowski writes:
>> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
>> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
>>
>> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
> Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
> distributable ?
The GPL and the Ope
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
>
> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
>
Hey Andrey,
Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
distributable ?
--
Dariusz Dwornikowski,
Institute of
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 09:32:00AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski
>
> * Package name: profanity
> Version : 0.4.0
> Upstream Author : James Booth
> * URL : http://www.profanity.im/
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski
* Package name: profanity
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : James Booth
* URL : http://www.profanity.im/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : a console based XMPP client
Prof
12 matches
Mail list logo