On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 08:03:02AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
> replacing dput if there's a reason for it?
I must concur. I can't see the reason for dput, dupload and dput-ng to
co-exist. If dput-ng has the momentum and is a
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:53:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Wrong. It will be a new thing, not related to the previous thing.
It's evidently related: if not in terms of actual reused code but in terms
of who is expected to use it and what it is to be used for.
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > If not, why are you claiming to replace their code? It's fine to be
> > writing "something else" to replace older code; but it's fairly rude to
> > be claiming that whatev
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 02:40:53PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Yes, I know it still lacks code name aliases, but that's something we
> are aware of. Also, the user prompting interface is not very clean yet :)
Please make sure that it can be overridden on the commandline, thanks.
Kind regards
Philip
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> If not, why are you claiming to replace their code? It's fine to be
> writing "something else" to replace older code; but it's fairly rude to
> be claiming that whatever you're writing is the "next generation" of
> that older code
Any rewr
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 05:25:20PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 28.10.2012 08:03, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
> > > replacing dput if there's a rea
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28.10.2012 08:03, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
> > replacing dput if there's a reason for it?
>
> As for us, we'd welcome that. However, that's primarily left
Hi,
On 28.10.2012 14:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 28.10.2012 13:06, Arno Töll wrote:
>> On 28.10.2012 13:57, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Does it prevent uploading security updates to the main archive by
>>> default?
>>
>> Adam, with his Release Team hat on, suggested us to prevent this for
>> t-p
On 28.10.2012 13:06, Arno Töll wrote:
On 28.10.2012 13:57, Florian Weimer wrote:
Does it prevent uploading security updates to the main archive by
default?
Adam, with his Release Team hat on, suggested us to prevent this for
t-p-u likewise.
I think it was p-u, but more as a grumble about an
Hi,
On 28.10.2012 13:57, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does it prevent uploading security updates to the main archive by
> default?
Adam, with his Release Team hat on, suggested us to prevent this for
t-p-u likewise. We have the infrastructure and possibilities to
implement a check like this, and it is
* Arno Töll:
> dput-ng features many enhancements over dput, such as more
> comprehensive checks, an easy to use plugin system, and code
> designed to handle the numerous archives that any Debian package
> hacker will interact with.
Does it prevent uploading security updates to the main archive b
Hi,
On 28.10.2012 08:03, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
> replacing dput if there's a reason for it?
As for us, we'd welcome that. However, that's primarily left to the
current dput maintainer and his interest in that. Also note, we k
I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
replacing dput if there's a reason for it?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Arno Töll"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arno Töll
thanks
* Package name: dput-ng
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Arno Töll , Paul Tagliamonte
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~paultag/dput-ng
* License :
14 matches
Mail list logo
