Trimming the cc list down to something somewhat less large.
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> It is a bug in Debian: The multiarch tuples are not documented/defined
>> in Debian.
> Fine, reassigning to policy.
> Never say I didn't do anything for you... :)
> Policy main
reassign 664257 debian-policy 3.9.3.1
affects 664257 =
tags 664257 = upstream
quit
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> It is a bug in Debian: The multiarch tuples are not documented/defined
> in Debian.
Fine, reassigning to policy.
Never say I didn't do anything for you... :)
Policy maintainers, see
Ian Jackson writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
> documented/defined"):
>> Ian Jackson writes:
>> > What change to the Debian operating system, or to processes,
>> > documents, infrastructure or organisatio
Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
documented/defined"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > What change to the Debian operating system, or to processes,
> > documents, infrastructure or organisational arrangements, maintained
> > by
Ian Jackson writes:
> Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
> documented/defined"):
>> On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> > I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though
>> > as always it could pr
]] Matthias Klose
> I won't fight for this. But it's some kind of Debian responsibility to
> address/forward these. Just filing this with the FHS and/or LSB is likely
> getting ignored. If you have better ways to track progress with this issue,
> please tell here.
JFTR, the FHS and the LSB has
On 20.04.2012 16:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
> documented/defined"):
>> On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though
>>> a
Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
documented/defined"):
> On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though
> > as always it could presumably be improved even more. I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 664257 important
Bug #664257 [general] multiarch tuples are not documented/defined
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664257: http://bugs.debian.org
severity 664257 important
thanks
On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples with lots more
>> information such as links to external ABI specs where I could find
>> them.
>
> I think the Multiarch
Hi Matthias,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples with lots more
> information such as links to external ABI specs where I could find
> them.
I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though
as always it could presumably be improved ev
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:03:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>Package: general
>Severity: serious
>Tags: wheezy, sid
>
>While we strive to get multiarch ready for squeeze, there is
>currently nothing to point to what the multiarch tuples actually
>mean, neither on the Debian side nor on some kin
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 21.03.2012 11:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Matthias Klose writes:
>>
>>> On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, b
On 21.03.2012 11:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Matthias Klose writes:
On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
system library structures, and so on form the ABI
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>>> Did you read the wiki page?
>>
>> Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
>> system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple
>> that I was giv
On 19/03/12 14:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
> first thing would be the documentation of each tuple currently used by
> Debian (including the ones used for the non-default biarch multilibs).
Are you looking for the sort of information Jonathan gave? If not,
perhaps you could describe some well-known a
On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple
that I was giving examples of not what the upstream gcc f
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple
that I was giving examples of not what the upstream gcc folks were
looking for? I'm not sure I underst
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> While we strive to get multiarch ready for squeeze, there is
>> currently nothing to point to what the multiarch tuples actually
>> mean, neither on the Debian side nor on some kind of standards side
>> like the FHS or LSB. This has to be docu
Matthias Klose wrote:
> While we strive to get multiarch ready for squeeze, there is
> currently nothing to point to what the multiarch tuples actually
> mean, neither on the Debian side nor on some kind of standards side
> like the FHS or LSB. This has to be documented on the Debian side,
> and
Package: general
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy, sid
While we strive to get multiarch ready for squeeze, there is currently nothing
to point to what the multiarch tuples actually mean, neither on the Debian side
nor on some kind of standards side like the FHS or LSB. This has to be
documented
21 matches
Mail list logo
