Hello,
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:47:57 +0100
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> > Yes, that's probably a reasonable threshold. What should packages
> > like miredo and wide-dhcpv6-client do? Both of these hooks have to
> > do with
> Maybe they could stop pretending that the ifupdown configurat
On Feb 28, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, that's probably a reasonable threshold. What should packages like
> miredo and wide-dhcpv6-client do? Both of these hooks have to do with
Maybe they could stop pretending that the ifupdown configuration model
can properly support multiple address familie
On 28.02.2012 23:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> subsequent hooks. OTOH, there might be cases where that's beneficial
>>> because it lets a critical hook declare that an interface bring-up hasn't
>>> succeeded and the interface bring-u
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:59:42PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:37:29 +0100
> Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > (And I'd prefer this bug to be one against ifupdown and not
> > general, but YMMV.) But, definitly, filing a bug against general
> > saying these and these
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:27:15 -0800
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > When failure to execute a hook leads to interface being
> > non-operational.
> Yes, that's probably a reasonable threshold. What should packages
> like miredo and wide-dhcpv6-client do? Both of these hooks have to
> do with r
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > subsequent hooks. OTOH, there might be cases where that's beneficial
> > because it lets a critical hook declare that an interface bring-up hasn't
> > succeeded and the interface bring-up should be rolled back so the admin can
> >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:09:22PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:27:37 -0800
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > However, it's been reported that some scripts return wrong exit
> > > codes sometimes, causing failure during network configuration.
> > My doubt here is: what is th
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:37:29 +0100
Holger Levsen wrote:
> (And I'd prefer this bug to be one against ifupdown and not
> general, but YMMV.) But, definitly, filing a bug against general
> saying these and these package need to be fixed wont do it.
Also, I find it fits general perfectly,
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:37:29 +0100
Holger Levsen wrote:
> just from what I've read in those two replies to this bug yet, I
> think I agree that this change should be reverted.
> And if you really want/need/do this change which needs changes in 30
> (or so) other packages, then please fil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 661591 ifupdown
Bug #661591 [general] packages providing ifupdown scripts must have those
scripts fixed if needed
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'ifupdown'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
reassign 661591 ifupdown
thanks
Hi,
just from what I've read in those two replies to this bug yet, I think I agree
that this change should be reverted.
And if you really want/need/do this change which needs changes in 30 (or so)
other packages, then please file 30 bugs against those package an
On 28.02.2012 20:27, Steve Langasek wrote:
> subsequent hooks. OTOH, there might be cases where that's beneficial
> because it lets a critical hook declare that an interface bring-up hasn't
> succeeded and the interface bring-up should be rolled back so the admin can
> try again.
If that is the
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:24:43AM +0100, Andrew O. Shadura wrote:
> Starting with the last beta, ifupdown calls run-parts for if-*.d scripts
> with --exit-on-error, so if the script fails, interface isn't marked as
> configured (see #547587).
> However, it's been reported that some sc
Package: general
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Starting with the last beta, ifupdown calls run-parts for if-*.d scripts
with --exit-on-error, so if the script fails, interface isn't marked as
configured (see #547587).
However, it's been reported that some scrip
14 matches
Mail list logo
