On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:09:07AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[snip]
> > I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
> > file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
> > the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
> > his
David Mandelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
>> file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
>> the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
>> hi
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 07:12:05AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
> > Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
> > is a potential problem. But lin
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
> file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
> the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
> his system on a daily, weekly, monthly, whatever basis
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
> Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
> is a potential problem. But lintian (and others: apt-file) could
> depend on this package (say, debian-dist-con
Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
is a potential problem. But lintian (and others: apt-file) could
depend on this package (say, debian-dist-contents).
Justin
6 matches
Mail list logo
