On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:27:47PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > It boils down to "jpeg6-2 is the only important thing. Forget about
> > > jpeg8 and jpeg9, which bring incompatible changes".
> > There are other features in newer libjpeg that packages do need, even
> > when not using exotic JPEG
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:29:27PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/04/13 20:39, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > It boils down to "jpeg6-2 is the only important thing. Forget about
> > jpeg8 and jpeg9, which bring incompatible changes".
>
> There are other features in newer libjpeg that package
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 12:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/04/13 20:39, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > It boils down to "jpeg6-2 is the only important thing. Forget about
> > jpeg8 and jpeg9, which bring incompatible changes".
>
> There are other features in newer libjpeg that packages do ne
On 25/04/13 20:39, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> It boils down to "jpeg6-2 is the only important thing. Forget about
> jpeg8 and jpeg9, which bring incompatible changes".
There are other features in newer libjpeg that packages do need, even
when not using exotic JPEG-like formats. For instance, ioq
Hi all,
On Do 25 Apr 2013 22:29:53 CEST Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 25.04.2013 20:49, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
Can this be a proposal? Package libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo using an
alternatives setup and thus, making both libs installable in parallel.
Packagers can then build-depend on one or the other
I think this might be a good move, since the libjpeg-turbo maintainer
still wants to keep compatibility with libjpeg7/8, and he doesn't want
to implement incompatible changes, which might be introduced when
coding Jpeg2000 or JpegXR.
And if there's and consensus in the community that libjpeg-turbo
On Apr 25, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Please no. If libjpeg-turbo is the saner implementation, which reading
> through the messages posted so far it seems like, let's switch to it fully.
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 25.04.2013 20:49, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Can this be a proposal? Package libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo using an
> alternatives setup and thus, making both libs installable in parallel.
> Packagers can then build-depend on one or the other libjpeg
> implementations.
Please no. If libjpeg-turbo is t
Hello,
The KDE maintainer in Fedora started an interesting discussion some time
ago in Digikam's mailing list. There was input from the very IJG:
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2013-January/066206.html
It boils down to "jpeg6-2 is the only important thing. Forget about jpeg8
and jpe
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 20:49 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Do 25 Apr 2013 18:41:40 CEST Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Bill Allombert
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:23:04AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >>> Hi Bill and Debian Developers,
> >>>
>
Hi all,
On Do 25 Apr 2013 18:41:40 CEST Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Bill Allombert
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:23:04AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi Bill and Debian Developers,
My proposal is:
A. Add libjpeg-turbo to Debian archive (that's easy)
B. Add required
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:01:50PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Libjpeg-turbo website [3] has all the signs of an healthy open source
> project - A SVN repo with many commiters, bug tracker, a mailing list
> with open discussion etc.
libjpeg-turbo is also used by webkit, blink, and gecko.
Mike
-
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:48:48PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >C. Decide which package should provide default libjpeg-dev library
> Last statement from Bill: libjpeg by IJG
The current IJG has nothing to do with the IJG that originally created JPEG.
The last activity of original IJG was in 19
Hi Ondřej,
I have just uploaded libjpeg-turbo to Debian and it still hovers in NEW [1].
On Mi 24 Apr 2013 11:23:04 CEST Ondřej Surý wrote:
Debian has already open ITP[3] #602034 for libjpeg-turbo, which
support libjpeg62 API/ABI and also some important bits of libjpeg8. As
libjpeg is one of th
14 matches
Mail list logo
