On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 13:15 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi Ritesh,
>>
>> thank you for your suggestion on how to improve Debian! Even though I'm
>> closing this bug on the assumption that it ain't useful to report arbitary
>> wishlist bugs
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 13:15 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
>
> thank you for your suggestion on how to improve Debian! Even though I'm
> closing this bug on the assumption that it ain't useful to report arbitary
> wishlist bugs about things which could be implemented to improve Debian,
Hi Holger,
My proposal is just to see if there can be a way to glue up all the bits n'
pieces together.
There is a lot of information scattered at multiple places, which if mined
properly, can serve as one of the best resource.
Debian Bug Reports contain a lot of valuable data. But is it conne
On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:57:35 +0530
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Currently, when I am using a new package, or if I have queries
> regarding the new package, my friends are upstream and the web.
> Usually, not much authentic information.
$ man package ?
If the manpage is incomplete or not sufficien
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Just an idea.
Currently, when I am using a new package, or if I have queries
regarding the new package, my friends are upstream and the web.
Usually, not much authentic information.
I am requesting a tracker kind approach for each package.
It could be very sim
5 matches
Mail list logo
