Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-14 Thread Hasse Hagen Johansen
> "Eugene" == Eugene V Lyubimkin writes: Eugene> Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: >> I think it would be better to ask which package to use for a >> virtual if it is installed interactively. In my case actually >> didn't want exim4 neither citadel - not for a mailserver. In most

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: > I think it would be better to ask which package to use for a virtual if > it is installed interactively. In my case actually didn't want exim4 > neither citadel - not for a mailserver. In most cases I think ssmtp > or nullmailer is more appropiate, but that is another

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Hasse Hagen Johansen
> "Daniel" == Daniel Baumann writes: >> Maybe apt-get/aptitude could just asks the user when they find >> that multiple packages Provides the dependency? Daniel> package maintainers should just fix their packages... >> I know that would not work non-interactively, but that c

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: > Yes. Actually like the virtual packages work right now it probably ok to > just take one of the packages satisfying the mail-transfer-agent. jup. > But right now I don't quite understand how apt-get/aptitude would pick the > mail-transfer-agent to use? is it first hi

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Hasse Hagen Johansen
> "Daniel" == Daniel Baumann writes: Daniel> Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: >> I just would let you know that maybe it is a more general problem >> as mdadm is also pulling citadel-server in as a dependency Daniel> this really sucks (in this case only if you have recommends

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread James Vega
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:35:20PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: > > I just would let you know that maybe it is a more general problem as mdadm > > is also pulling citadel-server in as a dependency > > this really sucks (in this case only if you have recommends enabled

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: > I just would let you know that maybe it is a more general problem as mdadm > is also pulling citadel-server in as a dependency this really sucks (in this case only if you have recommends enabled, though). someone should check all depends and recommends in debian to no

Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency

2008-12-13 Thread Hasse Hagen Johansen
Package: general Severity: important Hi Looking around for why citadel-server was pulled in instead of exim4 (which I believe is still the default MTA in debian). I saw the bug #474999 I just would let you know that maybe it is a more general problem as mdadm is also pulling citadel-server in as