Hi all,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:46:01 +0900
Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly.
> >
> > Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages
> > (e.g. rsync) are not started by default becaus
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:16:53 +0900
Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly.
>
> Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages
> (e.g. rsync) are not started by default because it is set i
Hello Pierre,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem here is somehow very generic, and that using a
> virtual package like proposed in the bug report (#500176) doesn't scale
> well. Especially for dns daemons. Packaging two of them myself (nsd3
> that is an authoritativ
also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.09.1024 +0200]:
> Another problem that is looking for a solution is programs such as apache
> or dnsmasq which binaries may be used by other software (gnome-user-share,
> virt-manager...) but shouldn't be running daemons in this case.
> It is esp
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:07:00AM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]:
> > FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that
> > bug of course.
> [...]
> > I don't think this is too hard
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:07:00AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]:
> > FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that
> > bug of course.
> [...]
> > I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone t
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]:
> FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that
> bug of course.
[...]
> I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone that is installing
> multiple DNS softwares on the same machine. A bit more
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:13:32PM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
> > has a bug about it, it's
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:46:11 +0200
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agreed, that would be nice. While this is something to consider for
> > squeeze release goals, how do we solve the problem for lenny?
>
> I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly.
On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
> has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
also note that this bug isn't symmetric with
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:48:18AM +, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]:
> > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none
> > of them has a bu
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]:
> FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none
> of them has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
Uh, don't you think that marki
severity 500176 important
thanks
FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:47:38AM +, martin f krafft wrote:
> reopen 5
13 matches
Mail list logo
