Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:16:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
>>
>> - timing wrt the release
>> - timing wrt the "half of the developers are VAC" status we generally
>> have in August
>> - the obvious lack of preparation
>
> In addition, security issues should b
Christian Perrier wrote:
>> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
>> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held to
>
> Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
> -devel, I feel like there was *no* strong a
Le Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:16:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
>
> - timing wrt the release
> - timing wrt the "half of the developers are VAC" status we generally
> have in August
> - the obvious lack of preparation
In addition, security issues should better be reported upstream first s
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:09 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> > package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> > filed.
>
> Yes, please. I th
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:09 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> > package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> > filed.
>
> Yes, please. I th
TK>> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
TK>>> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
TK>>> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held
TK>>> to
TK>>
TK>> Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
TK>
On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> filed.
Yes, please. I think the only way the damage of this bad bug filing can be
mitigated i
On Monday 25 August 2008 07:16, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
> > reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held
> > to
>
> Even though I overread the th
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held to
Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
-devel, I feel like there was
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:05:30PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Severity: grave
> This message about the error concerns a few packages at once. I've
> tested all the packages (for Lenny) on my Debian mirror. All scripts
> of packages (marked as executable) we
10 matches
Mail list logo
