Re: Bug#45307: [PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server

1999-09-20 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:20:11AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > How are multiple identd packages going to know which one belongs in > inetd.conf without the use of alternatives? All of them will add inetd entries, but only one will be enabled. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian

Re: Bug#45307: [PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server

1999-09-20 Thread Clint Adams
> This is unnecessary unless something actually is going to depend on it. None > of these packages overlap in their fs name space. The only thing they have > in common is the inetd.conf entry. This is easily managed with update-inetd, > just like finger and others. How are multiple identd packa

Re: Bug#45307: [PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server

1999-09-18 Thread Herbert Xu
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The proliferation of ident daemons (midentd, oidentd, pidentd) in >> Debian necessitates the introduction of a virtual package that these >> packages can provide and conflict with (since you can only >> [reasonably] run one ident daemon at once). While "id

Re: Bug#45307: [PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server

1999-09-17 Thread Clint Adams
> The proliferation of ident daemons (midentd, oidentd, pidentd) in > Debian necessitates the introduction of a virtual package that these > packages can provide and conflict with (since you can only > [reasonably] run one ident daemon at once). While "ident-daemon" > seems more intuitive, the nam