On Monday 29 October 2007 23:42, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> > > But the license on the package itself doesn't make that
> > > restriction.
> >
> > If I have understood things correctly, in England (and
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> > But the license on the package itself doesn't make that restriction.
>
> If I have understood things correctly, in England (and the rest of the
> UK?) the copyright is owned by the crown and
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:42:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
> > > The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
> > > the
> > > conventional sense. The
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
> > The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
> > the
> > conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge
> > University Press) has an excl
Isabel Drost wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> Mere local law shouldn't make a package DFSG non-free. I'd bet there are
>> many packages in Debian whose distribution or use violates local law
>> somewhere in the world.
>
> Just a tiny example: I guess, Debian still con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/07 09:36, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
> On 23 Oct 2007, at 15:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
>> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
>>> The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
>>> the
>>> convention
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Mere local law shouldn't make a package DFSG non-free. I'd bet there are
> many packages in Debian whose distribution or use violates local law
> somewhere in the world.
Just a tiny example: I guess, Debian still contains many packages that cont
ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> But the license on the package itself doesn't make that restriction.
If I have understood things correctly, in England (and the rest of the
UK?) the copyright is owned by the crown and therefore it is the crown
that sets the license. I
On 23 Oct 2007, at 15:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
the
conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge
University Press) has an exclusive commercial right to
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:44:51AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> But the license on the package itself doesn't make that restriction.
> Mere local law shouldn't make a package DFSG non-free. I'd bet there are
> many packages in Debian whose distribution or use violates local law
> somewhere in
On 23-Oct-07, 09:04 (CDT), Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
> > The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
> > the
> > conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge
> > University Press
ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:
> The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in
> the
> conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge
> University Press) has an exclusive commercial right to print the AV
> (and the BCP, but that's
Hi,
On 23 Oct 2007, at 11:52, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
Since I'm not at all familiar with the legacy of copyright laws
around
the British Royal Family, I'm setting the severity to normal, using
'could' in the subject and Cc-ing debian-d
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Since I'm not at all familiar with the legacy of copyright laws around
> the British Royal Family, I'm setting the severity to normal, using
> 'could' in the subject and Cc-ing debian-devel. But I thought the issue
> was worth raising
Package: bible-kjv-text
Severity: normal
Hello,
I was browsing Wikipedia after visiting a special exibition about the
history of the Bible in the United Kingdom and I stumbled on this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version#Copyright_status
"The terms of the letters patent prohibit
15 matches
Mail list logo
