On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:15:11PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear there. I'm not advocating total chaos
> inside any single repo, or any group of repos maintained by the same
> people. Localised consistency in these things is highly desirable,
> for all the reasons you mention
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:40:04PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > > ... surprised to learn that git-import-dsc can only import one
> > > .deb per repo.
> > This indeed is a limitation of git-import-dsc that could quiet simply be
> > fixed if this should be needed.
>
> I'm not sure this is totally trivial t
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> yes, using .git/config through git-config is definitely better, as
> developper could set some behavior through his ~/.gitconfig.
>
> It's common practice for git tools to use some namespace in
> .git/config, hence it should be
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:54:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > if you just set up .git/gbp.conf correcty (once) - you can certainly
> > oveerride gbp.conf on the commandline at any time.
>
> A bit OT, bit why not use .git/config ?
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:40:04PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > gitpkg has a much more narrow focus and concerns itself solely with the
> > task of generating a valid Debian source package from a(ny) git repo.
> > It takes just
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:54:15PM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > if you just set up .git/gbp.conf correcty (once) - you can certainly
> > oveerride gbp.conf on the commandline at any time.
>
> A bit OT, bit why not use .git/config ?
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> if you just set up .git/gbp.conf correcty (once) - you can certainly
> oveerride gbp.conf on the commandline at any time.
A bit OT, bit why not use .git/config ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi Ron,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:40:04PM +0930, Ron wrote:
[..snip..]
> gitpkg has a much more narrow focus and concerns itself solely with the
> task of generating a valid Debian source package from a(ny) git repo.
> It takes just a tag (of any tree-ish form) indicating the version to
> release
Hi Guido,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:03:36PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > I know I'm not the only one who feels that git-buildpackage is not
> > 'right' for them, and this is my best answer to that problem to date.
> > To po
Hi Ron,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron wrote:
[..snip..]
> I know I'm not the only one who feels that git-buildpackage is not
> 'right' for them, and this is my best answer to that problem to date.
> To point out a couple of concrete problems above and beyond prescribing
> the repo
Le vendredi 21 septembre 2007 à 20:49 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit :
> Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
> shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
> humble opinion it does not make so much sense to pack those tools
> together jus
Mike Hommey schrieb:
> What are we going to see next ? Yet another package because someone else
> will feel none of gitpkg or git-buildpackage fit his needs ?
Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > >
> > > * Package name: gitpkg
> > > Description :
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> >
> > * Package name: gitpkg
> > Description : helper scripts for maintaining packages with git
> >
> > This packages provides som
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gitpkg
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://people.debian.org/~ron/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gitpkg
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~ron/gitpkg/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: bash
Description : helper scrip
16 matches
Mail list logo
