Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 12:31, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I do not see why making the old stack available again, but blacklisted
> by default, discourages testing of the newer stack. If you have both
> available, then yes, users can switch to the new stack more easily, but
> at least they will
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
> > please mention the uname of your tests
>
> I'll see if I can do the tests on a clean install with the latest linux
> images tomorrow.
uname:
Linux barebone1 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:38:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > My IIDC cameras do not work correctly with a juju-enabled libdc1394
> > 2.0.1. Furthermore, apart from coriander there are no applications that
> > have migrated from libdc1394 v1 to v2.
>
> even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
>
[ stripping cc list to relevant bug report + devel for general info ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> Given the pace of kernel releases, I do not believe 2.6.26 is possible
> for lenny, but 2.6.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
> > 2.6.24.x. If that is so, then I kindly request that the debian kernel
> > packages will be released with the stable Firewire stack modules
> > compiled.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> > Early March 2008
> > Very soft freeze
> [...]
> > Mid of July 2008
> > Full freeze
>
> I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
