On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Any reason to name the package lua-doc instead of luadoc? I really
> suggest luadoc: not only it's the upstream name for the software, but
> lua-doc really looks like "documentation for the Lua language"
> (as in perl-doc, python-doc)
* Enrico Tassi [Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:47:14 +0200]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> --- Please fill out the fields below. ---
>Package name: lua-doc
> Version: 3.0
> Upstream Author: Danilo Tuler as part of the Kepler Project <[EMAI
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: lua-doc
Version: 3.0
Upstream Author: Danilo Tuler as part of the Kepler Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://keplerproject.org/luadoc
3 matches
Mail list logo
