Rob Browning:
> Why in the world wouldn't you want to require 4 digits for the date?
Because of all the usual bad reasons, and one good one: it
doesn't matter. The LSM dates are always past tense, and
making the new requirement is trivial, all of thirty seconds
of coding. Converting all old date
This is really off-topic, but it's one of my pet peeves. Sorry.
Rob Browning:
> 5) Debian should use either the big or little endian format and always
> use four digits for the year. That way we won't have trouble when the
> millenium hits, and you can always tell by looking if it's big or
> litt
On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> [1] Yes, I know it was probably deliberate, but American middle-endian
> date-formats are stupid and confusing and I want them stamped out.
>
You have better things to do than to stamp about for the rest of your
life. Also, you will never get anyone's att
Mark W. Eichin writes ("Re: Bug#4329: Emacs has hardcoded path for jka-compr,
breaks at upgrade"):
> Did you upgrade from 19.29-3 to 19.31-2 as indicated in your message,
> or to 19.34-2, which is current?
19.34-2 hasn't reached my local mirror yet. Isn't it stil
Package: emacs
Version: 19.31-2
I just upgraded from 19.29-3, and it left me with the following
/etc/site-start.el:
(load "/usr/lib/emacs/19.29/lisp/jka-compr.elc")
(if (file-exists-p "/usr/lib/emacs/site-lisp/w3-init.el") (load "w3-init"))
(autoload 'lout-mode "lout-mode" "Mode for editing Lou
5 matches
Mail list logo
