Le samedi 16 décembre 2006 à 00:16 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Dec 14, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Let's say it this way: which devices that use the MMC protocol (or SD
> > storage)
> > are non-removable?
> Nevermind, I tought that the MTD drivers shared the same infr
On Dec 14, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's say it this way: which devices that use the MMC protocol (or SD
> storage)
> are non-removable?
Nevermind, I tought that the MTD drivers shared the same infrastructure.
I will upload a new udev package forcing all mmc, firewire, usb a
I demand that Modestas Vainius may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Incorrect permissions prevent a user to format removable media
Hmm? Preventing a user is required for formatting? :-)
s/to format/from formatting/
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
|
Hi,
2006 m. gruodis 14 d., ketvirtadienis 21:01, Marco d'Itri rašė:
> I don't, I believe that pmount is buggy and this is a security hole.
> While you can be pretty much sure that every USB and firewire device is
> removable, the same is not true for MMC devices.
>
> This is also related to #40264
Am Donnerstag 14 Dezember 2006 20:01 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Dec 14, Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2006 m. gruodis 11 d., pirmadienis 20:33, Marco d'Itri raš?:
> > > I do not think that every mmc* block device is removable,
> >
> > What do you think about following pmount polic
On Dec 14, Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006 m. gruodis 11 d., pirmadienis 20:33, Marco d'Itri raš?:
> > I do not think that every mmc* block device is removable,
> What do you think about following pmount policy on determining removable
> block
> devices? I think it would be a
6 matches
Mail list logo
