Le Lun 23 Janvier 2006 10:39, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> [Bart Martens]
>
> > The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a
> > replacement for flashplugin-nonfree.
>
> Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
> flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave th
[Alexander Sack]
> You mean take over the package?
If that is required, yes. But I suspect a friendly reenforcement of
the maintainer team is a better solution if one is able to get in
touch with the maintainer.
> Have you ever succeeded to get any communication started with Takuo
> during the l
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:39:00AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
> flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I
> do not see the point of two installer packages for macromedia flash.
> Please limit it to just on
[Bart Martens]
> The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a
> replacement for flashplugin-nonfree.
Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I
do not see the point of two installer packages for
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 17:09 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:30:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:30:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> [snip]
> > Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at least make the users feel how painful
> > nonfree software are to d
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
[snip]
> Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at least make the users feel how painful
> nonfree software are to deal with. Quite a usefule feature if you ask
> me!
Is it, though, the
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a
> replacement for flashplugin-nonfree.
>
> Similarities: Both Debian packages are GPL, and download the .tar.gz
> from the Macromedia website to comply to the Macromed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: flash-plugin
Version : 7.0.61.1
Upstream Author : Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://members.chello.be/ws35943/flash-plugin/
* License : GPL
Description :
9 matches
Mail list logo
