> Package: libgdbm1
> Version: 1.7.3-11
>
> Hi,
> I believe that the shared library exported by this package
> (libgdbm.so.1.7.3) is basically the same thing that other linux
> distributions (slackware and redhat in particular) choose to ship as
> libgdm.so.2.0.0 ... Perhaps Debian too shou
[Dan, this is about the correct .so-name for libgdbm; your list has
liggdbm.so.1.7.3, whereas the libc5.2 docs, Slackware, Red Hat have
libgdbm.so.2.0]
> if this is truly a bug, can you explain the two URLs I
> mentioned in the message below? (Already sent to debian-bugs, hence
> not CC'
Mark Eichin writes:
> could you give me more information on this? (I'm the current libgdbm
> maintainer.) Calling it libgdbm.so.2.0 would really seem like a
> mistake, since after all, libgdbm itself is only at 1.7.3... but I can
Well, it appears that the shared lib version number of libgdbm w
could you give me more information on this? (I'm the current libgdbm
maintainer.) Calling it libgdbm.so.2.0 would really seem like a
mistake, since after all, libgdbm itself is only at 1.7.3... but I can
probably put in a compatibility link if there's enough evidence for it
(namely, programs which
Package: libgdbm1
Version: 1.7.3-11
Hi,
I believe that the shared library exported by this package
(libgdbm.so.1.7.3) is basically the same thing that other linux
distributions (slackware and redhat in particular) choose to ship as
libgdm.so.2.0.0 ... Perhaps Debian too should do this?
5 matches
Mail list logo
