Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Adam Heath
>
> | The above makes it easy to exclude whole heiarachies, ie, /usr/share/doc.
>
> So will the filetype part of how Scott James is doing stuff.
>
> | It can also be used to alter /lib to /lib64 or /lib32, on the fly, during
> | install.
* Adam Heath
| The above makes it easy to exclude whole heiarachies, ie, /usr/share/doc.
So will the filetype part of how Scott James is doing stuff.
| It can also be used to alter /lib to /lib64 or /lib32, on the fly, during
| install.
You can't do that in a sane way anyhow. (Think libtool f
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>>
>> > Adam Heath wrote:
>> > > Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
>> > > mean, is being able to use it in a
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
> > > mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
> > >
>
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
> > mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
> >
> > Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
> >
> > filter mode:
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>
>> Adam Heath wrote:
>> > Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
>> > mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
>> >
>> >
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
> > mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
> >
> > Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
> >
>
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
filter mode: standard tar output
output mode: filesystem, .deb, .rpm
Repacking an
also sprach Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.11.0259 +0100]:
> Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
> mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, this is the sensible to do it.
> Repacking
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.09.2053 +0100]:
> > Probably yes on dpkg-repack. Definately not for dpkg-www. Which
> > is a sucky name, btw.
>
> Agreed. However, if dpkg-repack goes into dpkg, why not provide
> a means to edit a D
also sprach Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.09.2053 +0100]:
> Probably yes on dpkg-repack. Definately not for dpkg-www. Which
> is a sucky name, btw.
Agreed. However, if dpkg-repack goes into dpkg, why not provide
a means to edit a DEB file (without having to install it) too?
--
Please
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
> > Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
> > intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
>
> well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.09.1351 +0100]:
> | I really think reversion should be available.
>
> I think it's useless,
it's not.
I will probably rename it to debedit.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <
* martin f krafft
| also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
| > Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
| > intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
|
| well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended
| for
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
> Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
> intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended
for integration into dpkg, then reve
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 18:13 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I needed a tool to change the version number of DEB files after
> repacking them with dpkg-repack. So I wrote one. Very simple, does
> not really warrant its own package, but devscripts is also not
> really the place for it. It is unlikel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dpkg-reversion
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/dpkg-reversion
* License : Artistic
Description : change the version of a DEB
17 matches
Mail list logo
