-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:05:08PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 01-12-2004 alle 13:01 +, Mark Sheppard ha scritto:
> > Surely there's room for both
> >
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > | Status=Not/Installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi Wouter,
first thanks for your explanation, a bit more exhaustive, as well to
Christian for his link to the GFDL debate (from another mail).
of course i intend to release software free as of speech, so i am
evaluating the possibility to remove the
Op wo, 01-12-2004 te 16:44 +0100, schreef jaromil:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: jaromil in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
> > > know yo
* jaromil
| On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
|
| > May I suggest to move the package to non-free then?
|
| may i suggest to move the package out of Debian then?
Non-free is not Debian, so that's exactly what will happen.
| now please you all take a breath and sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: jaromil in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
> > know you at all) then consider that the GNU FDL license applied to the
El Miércoles 01 Diciembre 2004 16:44, jaromil escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: jaromil in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: jaromil in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
> > know you at all) then consider that the GNU FDL license applied to the
>
Re: jaromil in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
> know you at all) then consider that the GNU FDL license applied to the
> manual and documentation of hasciicam requires: the Invariant Sections
> being NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION, AUTHOR
* jaromil
| in case you are an arrogant person (i don't mean you are, i just don't
| know you at all) then consider that the GNU FDL license applied to the
| manual and documentation of hasciicam requires: the Invariant Sections
| being NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION, AUTHOR
In that case, I think y
9 matches
Mail list logo
