Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Could you point out the security issues you see in resmgr ?
[...security implications of fd passing]
> While it may make sense on some public terminals or demonstration
> systems, you do not want it on hosts where device security is
> important.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:46:18PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> >> I plan to have SANE built with resmgr support for Etch, and I hope
> >> other applications will support resmgr too. It can make life a lot
> >> easier, and changes to the code are really minimal.
> >
> > It is, however, a security
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> I plan to have SANE built with resmgr support for Etch, and I hope
>> other applications will support resmgr too. It can make life a lot
>> easier, and changes to the code are really minimal.
>
> It is, however, a security hole; it's functionally
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:03:43PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> For those of you interested, I've uploaded resmgr 1.0-1 to
> experimental (must go through NEW, etc.).
>
> I'll upload a version of sane-backends built with resmgr support to
> experimental when sane-backends 1.0.15 will be released
Hi,
For those of you interested, I've uploaded resmgr 1.0-1 to
experimental (must go through NEW, etc.).
I'll upload a version of sane-backends built with resmgr support to
experimental when sane-backends 1.0.15 will be released (end of next
week, IIRC).
I plan to have SANE built with resmgr sup
5 matches
Mail list logo
