Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> * Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
na
retitle 220401 ITP: kernel-linux-experimental -- Linux 2.4 kernel
thanks
I think you're very confused. Unfortunately, I don't have time for discussing
this with you. I'll just rename the package.
Now back to hacking.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Milla
Robert Millan wrote:
>Just thought I should give you a better reply.
>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
>> believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
>> you believe would
> Overly terse answers (and your previous dismissals of questions as
> "trivial" despite attempts to explain why they are non-trivial) do not
> reassure anyone that you are capable of packaging a critical system
> component, especially in an ambitiously different way.
I'm reassured.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Just thought I should give you a better reply.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
> >
> > Robert, your (frankl
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:49:49PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Could you elaborate? The obvious interpretation of your "Yes" is that
> you do not understand a large part of your target audience (new users
> who do not customize their kernels). By and large, that set of users
> d
Just thought I should give you a better reply.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>
> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
> believe w
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>>
>> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
>> believe
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>>
>> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
>> kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
>>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Did you consider ease of finding alternative packages through the normal
> UI like dselect and aptitude? I, for one, appreciate similar things to
> exist next to each other.
Well no (I use apt-get), but I think I can assume that (I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>
> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
> believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel pack
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > * Package name: linux-experimental
> >
> > I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> > kernel-linux-whatever instead?
Robert Millan wrote:
>There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone say
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>
> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
name choose
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>
> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
> someone else said, eventually there will be a ke
> * Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
someone else said, eventually there will be a kernel-freebsd or
kernel-netbsd, and having an uniform scheme to call these thin
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
>
> He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
s/transmeta.com/osdl.org/
>
> J
>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
>
> He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is ok now.
--
Fr
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux-experimental
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/CREDITS
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/
* License
20 matches
Mail list logo
