On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:24:19AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > Other people have cov
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Other people have covered why this breaks. Here's the solution I use:
> >
> > Make your buil
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> What needs to happen to get this into policy?
The usual - see /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.html
(or .txt.gz or .sgml.gz) for details.
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >
> > > Package: libtool
> > > Version: 1.5-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > libtool fails to build fr
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> > Package: libtool
> > Version: 1.5-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
> > build-dep on texi2html.
> >
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> It is noteworthy that the split build-arch/build-all seems to be next
>> to useless, as dpkg-buildpackage invokes build (because the former two
>> a optional) and "the build target should
Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> Why exactly is this? Is this really the correct behavior? Shouldn't
> dpk-buildpackage be invoked using the -B option?
It is. `dpkg-buildpackage -B' invokes debian/rules clean, build, binary-arch.
... Adam
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> It is noteworthy that the split build-arch/build-all seems to be next
> to useless, as dpkg-buildpackage invokes build (because the former two
> a optional) and "the build target should depend on those of the
> targets build-arch an
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
[...]
>> libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
>> build-dep on texi2html.
> libtool (and libtool1.4) *have* a build-dep on texi2html (and texinfo):
> Build-Depends
Cc'd to debian-devel, because I'm honestly unsure about this...
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Package: libtool
> Version: 1.5-3
> Severity: serious
>
> libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
> build-dep on texi2html.
>
libtool (and libtool1
10 matches
Mail list logo
