Erick Branderhorst writes ("Re: Bug#2059: dpkg and depend on versions"):
> Yes, I'm sure, the transcription was in chronological order. I didn't
> understand
> the `5' either.
Chronological order ?
> I was thinking that perhaps the < was causing
>
> Erick Branderhorst writes ("Bug#2059: dpkg and depend on versions"):
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.0.8
> >
> > I installed the man package (2.3.10-6) succesfully. After that I tried
> > to upgrade the libgdbm1 package (1.7.3-8). During i
Ian Jackson wrote:
>Note that < means less-than-or-equal-to in this context.
Could dpkg also support using <= for this meaning please? (Or does it
already?) Having to write < to mean <= is far from optimal; I think
it's something we should aim to get away from at some point.
--
Richard Kettlew
Erick Branderhorst writes ("Bug#2059: dpkg and depend on versions"):
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.0.8
>
> I installed the man package (2.3.10-6) succesfully. After that I tried
> to upgrade the libgdbm1 package (1.7.3-8). During installation of
> libgdbm1 dpkg report
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.0.8
I installed the man package (2.3.10-6) succesfully. After that I tried
to upgrade the libgdbm1 package (1.7.3-8). During installation of
libgdbm1 dpkg reports about libgdbm1 conflicting with man (<2.3.10-6)
and that man (version 2.3.10-5) is installed.
- Why is it re
5 matches
Mail list logo
