On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 10:27:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Regrettably, we don't have a libg++2.8.1.1 package yet.
>
> Well that means prcs should be moved out of hamm unfortunately unless we
> back off to libg++272.
Unfortunately, yes.
> > Please ask the prcs upstream authors to move away
At 10:27 +1000 1998-04-13, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Regrettably, we don't have a libg++2.8.1.1 package yet.
>
>Well that means prcs should be moved out of hamm unfortunately unless we back
>off to libg++272.
One of the problems with a libg++2.8.1.1 package is that it would need to
build libstdc++28 as
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> reassign 20587 general
> retitle 20587 There's no current libg++ package
> thanks
>>There is no std.h, this means that things like prcs won't compile.
> This is not a bug in libstdc++2.8-dev. libstdc++2.8-dev contains the
> standard C++ library, which d
3 matches
Mail list logo
