Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-02 Thread Pierre THIERRY
> How do I configure your script to restart apache when the power button > is pushed? Because it has nothing to do with shutdown, you just change /etc/acpi/events/powerbtn, and modify it to action=invoke-rc.d apache restart Quickly, le Moine Fou -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A pgpffTsY

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:38, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > >> Tags: patch > > You forgot to attach it :-) > > Shit. And the BTS doesn't seem to have noticed the patch tag... > You meant to put "tags 203588 patch", "thanks" and Bcc [EMAIL PROTECTED], didn't you? :-) > > Event-handling from cardmgr, ho

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Pierre THIERRY
>> Tags: patch > You forgot to attach it :-) Shit. And the BTS doesn't seem to have noticed the patch tag... > Event-handling from cardmgr, hotplug, usbmgr, acpid, apmd etc. are > really useful to be able to be customised by power users. I think I'm something like a power user, and I hate having

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:05, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Tags: patch > You forgot to attach it :-) > > I've edited it, and I'd bet I'm not the only one who has a > > dog/cat/turtle/etc who keeps knocking the power button, resulting in a > > change to scheduling a shutdown in 1 minutes time :) > > I

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Tags: patch > I've edited it, and I'd bet I'm not the only one who has a > dog/cat/turtle/etc who keeps knocking the power button, resulting in a > change to scheduling a shutdown in 1 minutes time :) I think a very good coded script should use a config file in /etc. But maybe it's a purist opini

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 14:58, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > > I think at least the RCness of this bug is rather dubious, frankly. If > > the script is configuration > > I don't think the script is meant to be edited... So it should be in > /usr/sbin. > I've edited it, and I'd bet I'm not the only one w

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 01, David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is this "script that gets run when the console user presses the power >button", and is it obvious that the user could potentially want to >configure it? If so, then it makes sense that it should be a >configuration file, and so by policy 10.

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Matthew Garrett wrote: > The user should be able to choose whether the power > button triggers shutdown or suspend to disk, for instance. While I do agree that this kind of script is best placed in /etc, this kind of choice can be configured by a "normal" /etc/acpid.conf that's read by the sc

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:32:47AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Ummm... I *did* find something strange, maybe you can give some more > insight on this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ find /etc -type f -perm -755|xargs file|grep ELF > etc/X11/rstart/rstartd.real:ELF 32-bit LSB > e

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Gunnar Wolf
David Z Maze dijo [Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:31:40AM -0400]: > Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > >> Severity: serious > >> Justification: Policy 9.1.1 > > ("Debian should obey the FHS"; I don't claim to be an FHS expert, bu

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Pierre THIERRY dijo [Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:58:23PM +0200]: > > I think at least the RCness of this bug is rather dubious, frankly. If > > the script is configuration > > I don't think the script is meant to be edited... So it should be in > /usr/sbin. There are many scripts in /etc that are not

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Pierre THIERRY
> You think wrong. The user should be able to choose whether the power > button triggers shutdown or suspend to disk, for instance. But one shouldn't have to edit a shell script to do it. It should just be necessary to edit a configuration file. Like modifying the action value to something like /u

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Matthew Garrett
Pierre THIERRY wrote: >I don't think the script is meant to be edited... So it should be in >/usr/sbin. You think wrong. The user should be able to choose whether the power button triggers shutdown or suspend to disk, for instance. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Freitag, 1. August 2003 15:31, David Z Maze wrote: > Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > >> Severity: serious > >> Justification: Policy 9.1.1 > > ("Debian should obey the FHS"; I don't claim to be an FHS expert, but > all i

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Pierre THIERRY
> I think at least the RCness of this bug is rather dubious, frankly. If > the script is configuration I don't think the script is meant to be edited... So it should be in /usr/sbin. Quickly, le Moine Fou -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A pgpjHl0gN4jh5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread David Z Maze
Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote: >> Severity: serious >> Justification: Policy 9.1.1 ("Debian should obey the FHS"; I don't claim to be an FHS expert, but all it seems to say about /etc is "no binaries", which this doesn't vio

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:09:36PM +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > > Package: acpid > > Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-31 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Policy 9.1.1 > > > > The shell script /etc/acpi/powerbtn.sh should be instal

Re: Bug#203588: acpid: Shell script has nothing to do in /etc

2003-08-01 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Package: acpid > Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-31 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 9.1.1 > > The shell script /etc/acpi/powerbtn.sh should be installed in something > else, like /usr/share/acpid/ or /usr/sbin/. > > -- System In