Bug#1877: at/batch do not mail output with sendmail installed

1995-11-23 Thread Harald Schueler
On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Ian Jackson wrote: > Are you sure this is true in at 2.9a-1 ? My source tree seems to > suggest that they use `mail'. I should probably add a dependency. Yes, I'm pretty sure (unless there is more than one at-2.9a-1 out there). The following diff works for me: --- debian.s

Bug#1877: at/batch do not mail output with sendmail installed

1995-11-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Harald Schueler writes ("Bug#1877: at/batch do not mail output with sendmail installed"): > Package: at > Version: 2.9a-1 > > The commands "at" and "batch" do not mail their output if sendmail is > installed as MTA instead of smail. This is because

Bug#1877: at/batch do not mail output with sendmail installed

1995-11-21 Thread Harald Schueler
Package: at Version: 2.9a-1 The commands "at" and "batch" do not mail their output if sendmail is installed as MTA instead of smail. This is because "atrun" uses "/usr/sbin/rmail" (from smail) for sending mail. I think this should be changed to /usr/bin/mail, or whatever "cron" uses (cron works wi