On Thu, 14 Dec 1995 02:52:42 -0500, Robert Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I closely examined the source code for both the old (2.4-5) and new
> (2.5-1) versions of mount(8) as well as the code for mount(2) in the
> 1.2.13 kernel before suggesting my suspicion that the problem might
> no longer
On Wed, 13 Dec 1995 21:45:45 -0500, Robert Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I can't duplicate this problem (I don't have a spare scratch disk to
> test with) but I suspect the mount error messages may have
> sufficiently improved with version 2.5. I really can't say much else
> about this partic
> I understand why you want to close the problem report. I don't like
> to see old bug reports linger, either. However, it worries me when
> people close bug reports because they "suspect" the problem "might"
> have been fixed. Especially when their only reason is that the
> version number was i
I can't duplicate this problem (I don't have a spare scratch disk to test
with) but I suspect the mount error messages may have sufficiently improved
with version 2.5. I really can't say much else about this particular case,
considering the circumstance.
I would close this bug, but I don't know if
4 matches
Mail list logo
