On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 12:37:11 AM Mountain Standard Time Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
> On Wed May 21, 2025 at 12:45 AM BST, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > As someone who is one of the most vocal supporters of standardizing
> > how we package things, I would like to say that I always worry when
> > som
On Wed May 21, 2025 at 12:45 AM BST, Soren Stoutner wrote:
As someone who is one of the most vocal supporters of standardizing
how we package things, I would like to say that I always worry when
someone says, “Don’t package this new thing. The things we have are
already good enough.” I worry
On Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7:15:19 AM Mountain Standard Time Roland Mas wrote:
> I've read all the feedback on this ITP, and will take it into account,
> including the renaming part. I'm uncomfortable with withdrawing it
> altogether, but I propose to sit on it for a few weeks, at least long
> enough
Hi Otto,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > * Package name: gwh
> > > Version : 0.6.14
> > > Upstream Contact: Roland Mas
> > > * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh
> > > * License : GPL-3+
> > > Programming
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:59:31PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh goo
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough
Hello,
Am 20.05.25 um 12:07 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself d
Le 20/05/2025 à 12:07, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough to encapsu
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve
On 20/05/25 at 16:27 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
> > is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
> > the archive makes that
Hello,
Am 20.05.25 um 13:32 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that probl
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve g
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself directly at
least first. Have you tried to do that?
F
Hi,
> > * Package name: gwh
> > Version : 0.6.14
> > Upstream Contact: Roland Mas
> > * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh
> > * License : GPL-3+
> > Programming Lang: bash
> > Description : git-buildpackage workflow helper
> >
> > This is a wrap
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:42:20AM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > so you have gwh, calling gbp, calling sbuild?, calling dpkg-buildpackage?,
> > calling debian/rules, calling dh, calling dh_auto_build?, calling
> > upstream's build system (which may itself often include layers)
> > i know
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
This is a wrapper script around git-buildpackage
so you have gwh, calling gbp, calling sbuild?, calling dpkg-buildpackage?,
calling debian/rules, calling dh, calling dh_auto_build?, calling upstream's
build system (which may itsel
Roland Mas writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Roland Mas
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: gwh
> Version : 0.6.14
> Upstream Contact: Roland Mas
> * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh
> * License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roland Mas
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gwh
Version : 0.6.14
Upstream Contact: Roland Mas
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: bash
Descripti
18 matches
Mail list logo
