Re: Bug#1000000: fixed in phast 1.6+dfsg-2

2021-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:30:18AM + schrieb Holger Levsen: > congrats to the Debian Med team for filing #100 *and* fixing it so > quickly! > well done & well deserved to hit this "special bug" :) Thanks a lot. I admit it was not a trivial one but I was motivated to spent some hours on i

Re: Bug#1000000: fixed in phast 1.6+dfsg-2

2021-11-20 Thread Holger Levsen
congrats to the Debian Med team for filing #100 *and* fixing it so quickly! well done & well deserved to hit this "special bug" :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳

Re: Bug#1000000: fixed in phast 1.6+dfsg-2

2021-11-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:12:12PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 05:12:10PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >... > > For the Debian package you could drop use_debian_packaged_libpcre.patch and > > use the embedded copy to not block the prce3 removal in Debian. > >

Re: Bug#1000000: fixed in phast 1.6+dfsg-2

2021-11-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 05:12:10PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >... > For the Debian package you could drop use_debian_packaged_libpcre.patch and > use the embedded copy to not block the prce3 removal in Debian. As a general comment, this would be a lot worse than keeping pcre3. If any co