In Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:19:19 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
> > I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying.
> > I really would love to remove it but there would be quite a lot of
> > trouble (and fear that legitimate info could be lost).
>
> Tell me
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:30:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > For the record, right now I'm the primary reason why the spam in the BTS
> > `magically' disappears, once it's reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying.
> I really would love t
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
>
> On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
> @bugs.debian.org or even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (those escape m
In Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:06:08 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
>
> On related note, it's fun to watch all the spams sent to
> @bugs.debian.org or even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> addresses. OTOH it's not fun to discover that someone spammed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (those escape m
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Did you ever wonder (assuming you even noticed) why so much spam gets sent
> to completely invalid addresss (for example, to message ids)? Because
> spamware sellers don't care if the "finely targetted" addresses they sell
> ac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Wirzenius) wrote on 24.12.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it is right now.
>
> Spam hasn't been ignored for the past six years, thank you very much.
> It thrives regardles
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 3.x, 95 and 98 to
> > > > nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft
Quoting John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
> subscription page:
> I think that you have some volunteers to send dunning notices within this
> thread (myself included). If you already are, could you post a summary of
> your act
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
> > > am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
> > > can ignore it, s
I was kind of feeling sorry about including you as a CC in the last
post--partial oversight, partial personal policy (I never quite know how
to deal with tertiary CCs: I generally detest people who adulterate a
message they're replying to, but I also think that responsibility for
replies stops abo
You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
subscription page:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe
is the mailinglist policy. Basically, the policy says either pay us
$1,000 up front or $1,999 after. Martin (Joey, whatever you prefer...),
Remco, Alexander,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
> > am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
> > can ignore it, so can ever
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
> am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
> can ignore it, so can everyone else, IMNHO.
Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:26PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
> > > discussions.
> > >
> > > Ben
> >
> > amen.
>
> OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely th
Daniel Stone wrote:
> > from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
> > > discussions.
> > >
> > > Ben
> >
> > amen.
>
> OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
> debian-devel
> from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
> > discussions.
> >
> > Ben
>
> amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
debian-devel spam-free. But the problem is that you
from the secret journal of esoR ocsirF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> A possability might be to have a signature key. This is not
> significantly different than the extra header idea but it would allow
> *any* MUA to work with it. Could be something like a GPG fingerprint or
> whatever. Just a thought.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 01:39:45AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > > Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
> > > that can be done about this?
> >
>
> Pardon my French, but this is a fucking stupid
Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > > Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > > Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 3.x, 95 and 98
> > > > > to
> > > > > nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft
19 matches
Mail list logo
