On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> if [ -e /etc/pam.d/login ]; then
> perl -pli~ -e 'm/session.*pam_selinux.so/ && s/^\#\s*//o'
> /etc/pam.d/login rm /etc/pam.d/login~
> fi
> if [ -e /etc/pam.d/ssh ]; then
> perl -pli~ -e 'm/session.*pam_selinux.so/ && do { s/^\#\s*//o;
> s/multip
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Thanks for the git repo pointer. I appreciate the opportunity to
> look at the kinds of changes you have needed, and will see if I can
> incorporate them into the next version of devotee I am (stalled on)
> writing.
T
On Tue, Aug 25 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
>> Squeeze.
>>
>> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
>> but I have not discussed this with
On Tue, Aug 25 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hmm? Why haven't these patches been sent upstream, then? I have
>> been also working at devotee-ng, which will have a plug-in
>> architecture, to allow votes to add in d
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
> Squeeze.
>
> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
> but I have not discussed this with him)
> Issues to be solved:
>(a) Get all De
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Zack has been patching devotee to allow more informal (and not at all
> binding) polls to be run with the same infrastructure. I think this
> could be a suitable candidate to run using that. It allows us to have a
> poll which can o
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hmm? Why haven't these patches been sent upstream, then? I have
> been also working at devotee-ng, which will have a plug-in
> architecture, to allow votes to add in dfferent pre-processing stacks
> (mime/gpg-decrypt, v
On 2009-08-04, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So make it easy to maintain... Attached is an example converting it to
> yaml with python table generation, coping with waivers.
I deployed that now. Result available on [1], still quite some question
marks, though.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://re
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:07:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>Any thoughts? We could have such a vote over and done in about two weeks,
>with the DPL's consent, and it'd seem a lot more inclusive and less
>cabal-tastic than how things seem to be working atm...
Personally, I think the last thin
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Aug 11 10:12, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> > Personally I don't think we should do a GR to recommend a freeze or release
> > date.
> > We already used the DPL election to push a release, when it was *long* due,
> > but
> > I don't think we sho
This one time, at band camp, Anthony Towns said:
> Any thoughts? We could have such a vote over and done in about two weeks,
> with the DPL's consent, and it'd seem a lot more inclusive and less
> cabal-tastic than how things seem to be working atm...
Is there some reason we need something as heav
Anthony Towns dijo [Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:07:33PM +1000]:
> So, with August almost half-way over, I guess the release team's not
> going to be doing much more to seek input from non-key teams/developers.
>
> I still think it'd be interesting and useful to get broader input,
> though. Something l
On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Aug 11 10:12, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> Personally I don't think we should do a GR to recommend a freeze or release
>> date.
>> We already used the DPL election to push a release, when it was *long* due,
>> but
>> I don't think we should
On Tue Aug 11 10:12, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Personally I don't think we should do a GR to recommend a freeze or release
> date.
> We already used the DPL election to push a release, when it was *long* due,
> but
> I don't think we should push a freeze.
Zack has been patching devotee to al
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
About freeze timing we think that DebConf should definitely not fall
into a freeze
We noticed that releases in the first quarter of the year
worked o
Le Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:07:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > > We'll be consulting all key teams within Debian to see how their plans
> > > and schedules can fit into a new timeline. Before the end of August we
> > > hope to
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > About freeze timing we think that DebConf should definitely not fall
> > into a freeze
> > We noticed that releases in the first quarter of the year
> > worked out quite
Hi Anthony,
On 2009-08-04, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> I'm grateful for those suggestions, Anthony. That page is just a pain
>> to maintain though. Not everything on it is up-to-date yet but I updated
>> quite some chunks.
> So make it
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I'm grateful for those suggestions, Anthony. That page is just a pain
> to maintain though. Not everything on it is up-to-date yet but I updated
> quite some chunks.
So make it easy to maintain... Attached is an example converting i
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > with something like Users: "45 (w)" to save space. Having
> > (w) link to a list post explaining the waiver would
> > probably be helpful for people who'd like to understand
> > why armel gets a waiver for
Hi Anthony,
On 2009-08-03, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So arm's dropped off that page, kfreebsd-* have been bumped to "TBD",
> and alpha, hppa are still accompanied by ia64, powerpc, mips and s390 as
> being "at risk". There's lots of fields with just a "?" -- apparently
> there's no info on whether t
Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 16:51 + schrieb Anthony Towns:
> amd64 has d-i support, surely? it did for lenny, despite lenny's
> page...
Yes it does and still works fine (at least for me).
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So, http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html lists kfreebsd-*
> and m68k as not release candidates, and arm, ia64, mips and powerpc as
> "at risk" in addition to alpha and hppa. Only m68k is listed as having
> RM concerns.
Hi!
Aurelien Jarno schrieb:
>> The press release not only mentions release goals but also
>> "infrastructure goals" ftpmaster would like to have done by then.
> Then, maybe the ftpmasters should communicate through
> debian-devel-announce *in addition* to the press releases.
To the best of my kn
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> The press team are still announcing [1] this as a "decision to adopt the
> policy of timed release freezes beginning with the next release", while
> RT maintain that it is under consideration. Which is true?
Both! ;-) Or the latter, ta
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
> but I have not discussed this with him)
I will be involved in this, but I find it difficult to get enough free time.
> Issues to be solved:
>(a) G
On Thu, Jul 30 2009, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
>> Squeeze.
>>
>> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
>>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:58:14PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Aurelien Jarno schrieb:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> The following goals for Squeeze have been identified up to now:
> [ some stuff ]
>
> > And according to the press releas
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Architectures
> =
> As some of you might have noticed, we added the architectures
> kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 to testing. [...]
> However, two architectures also have issues we need to bring to your
> attention: We sent
Hi!
Aurelien Jarno schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> The following goals for Squeeze have been identified up to now:
[ some stuff ]
> And according to the press release:
[ some more stuff ]
The press release not only mentions release goals but also
"infras
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
> Squeeze.
>
> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
> but I have not discussed this with him)
> Issues to
Hi,
I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
Squeeze.
Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
but I have not discussed this with him)
Issues to be solved:
(a) Get all Debian patches to the reference security pol
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 30 Jul 2009 19:41:42 +0200, a écrit :
> > Architectures
> > =
> >
> > As some of you might have noticed, we added the architectures
> > kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 to testing. This is not a promise
> > that they will be part of Squeeze, but we consider it r
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> sorry for sending out this mail so late. It should have gone out a bit
> earlier, but the delay allowed us to update our views on the timeline
> based on the feedback we received by the community - see below for
> details.
Was it re
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> time-based freezes
> ==
>
> For the squeeze release (and future releases), we are considering a
> time-based freeze, meaning that the freeze will happen at a predictable
> and predetermined time with the release happening
Hi,
> The following goals for Squeeze have been identified up to now:
> * multiarch
> * boot performance
> * high quality packages (piuparts clean and other QA subgoals)
> * prepare for the new package formats
> * remove obsolete libraries
> * add kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
> * full I
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> The following goals for Squeeze have been identified up to now:
> * multiarch
> * boot performance
> * high quality packages (piuparts clean and other QA subgoals)
> * prepare for the new package formats
> * remove obsolete libraries
(Torn between replying to -project for the former, -devel for the
latter.)
Luk Claes (30/07/2009):
> Adam D. Barratt (adsb), Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) and Jurij
> Smakov (jurij) joined us as release assistants. Let's welcome them in
> our team.
Welcome!
> Architectures
> =
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
