On 2015-08-23 14:27, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:30:40 +0200, Aurelien Jarno
> wrote:
> > On 2015-08-22 19:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > So in short we should try to fix these packages, but given they are no
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:30:40 +0200, Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> On 2015-08-22 19:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I therefore believe that we should try to work to ensure arch:all
> > > packages can be built on all major architectures.
On 2015-08-22 19:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > This is all great news!
>
> > > If I'm not mistaken, the last feature that needs to be implemented in
> > > wanna-build for us to be able to drop all maintainer-uploaded binaries,
>
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > This is all great news!
> > If I'm not mistaken, the last feature that needs to be implemented in
> > wanna-build for us to be able to drop all maintainer-uploaded binaries, and
> > only ship binaries built on the buildds, is buil
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:26:07PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> -- are arch:all packages not building on other architectures worth filing
> >> FTBFS bugs for?
> >
> > I think this should be reported (it's probably common sense that you
> > should be able to rebuild a package on a given support
Hi,
On 2015-08-21 10:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Auto-building arch:all packages
> > ===
>
> > We have worked on getting arch:all packages buildable on our
> > autobuilders. We've got a fe
* Afif Elghraoui , 2015-08-22, 13:19:
Would it be a good idea for the buildds to automatically submit FTBFS
bug reports?
I don't think so. That'd be a lot of BTS noise.
I think maintainers with dozens or hundreds of packages don't monitor
all their build logs.
buildds send failure notificat
On السبت 22 آب 2015 07:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail
>> > on !amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've seen that a lot when
>> > doing archive rebuilds on armhf. I never got around to reporting
>> > most of FTFBFses -- are
On 22/08/15 16:48, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> -- are arch:all packages not building on other architectures worth filing
>> FTBFS bugs for?
>
> I think this should be reported (it's probably common sense that you
> should be able to
* Mehdi Dogguy , 2015-08-22, 15:34:
I am not sure about the status on FTP-masters' side... but I think it
only requires the project deciding when we will enable throw-away
binaries by default. But before doing so, we should take some time
testing the arch:all packages. Once that done, the archi
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I feel that arch:all packages requiring a specific architecture (or not
> > buildable on amd64) are quite marginal.
> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail on
> !amd64 despite having no valid excuse.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> Auto-building arch:all packages
> >> ===
> >> [snip]
> > This is all great news!
> > If I'm not mistaken, the
* Adam Borowski [2015-08-22 16:35]:
> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail
> on !amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've seen that a lot when
> doing archive rebuilds on armhf. I never got around to reporting
> most of FTFBFses -- are arch:all packages not buil
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> I feel that arch:all packages requiring a specific architecture (or not
> buildable on amd64) are quite marginal.
On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail on
!amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've see
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Auto-building arch:all packages
>> ===
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
> This is all great news!
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the last feature that needs to be implemented in
> wanna-buil
2015-08-21 19:54 GMT+02:00 Jakub Wilk :
> Hmm, how do you build only arch:all packages in sbuild?
See commit below, not uploaded to sid yet:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/buildd-tools/sbuild.git/commit/?id=fec82ed70d7efdfe17f676c60e1114bd8bb4a888
--
Cheers,
Luca
* Mehdi Dogguy , 2015-08-21, 13:12:
We tested our changes as much as we were able to and enabled arch:all
uploads for Sid and Experimental.
:D
Before rushing on uploading source-only packages, please do test your
packages by building, installing and testing them locally in order to
minimize
Hi Mehdi,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Auto-building arch:all packages
> ===
> We have worked on getting arch:all packages buildable on our
> autobuilders. We've got a few patches [2,3] added to make that
> happen. Architecture indepe
18 matches
Mail list logo
