On 2010-10-20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> What is omitted is the rationale for doing so at this stage. Removing an
> release architecture with an active porter group is not something that
> should be done on the ground of some administrative evaluation table.
You surely read the IRC meeting logs? A
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:22:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As previously announced[1], hppa is no longer a release architecture for
> Squeeze.
What is omitted is the rationale for doing so at this stage. Removing an
release architecture
with an active porter group is not somethin
2 matches
Mail list logo