Julien Cristau debian.org> writes:
> It should just be forced despite the bd-uninstallable. sysvinit-utils
> and util-linux are essential, so they're already in the build chroot, so
> whether a newer version is available and uninstallable doesn't matter.
Not if the B-D is versioned, unfortunate
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:46:30 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While investigating libspiro build, I found BD-Uninstallable on powerpcspe.
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libspiro&suite=sid
>
> > Dependency installability problem for libspiro on powerpcspe:
> >
>
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2015-07-20 07:31:37)
> The general solution for build dependency cycles is build profiles:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec
while correct in theory (the syntax is supported by dpkg and apt), the buildds
are not yet able to make use of build profile information
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> How do we fix it?
The general solution for build dependency cycles is build profiles:
https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec
However, in this case it appears the Depends is a workaround to help
with smooth upgrades to jessie and could
Hi,
While investigating libspiro build, I found BD-Uninstallable on powerpcspe.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libspiro&suite=sid
> Dependency installability problem for libspiro on powerpcspe:
>
> sysvinit-utils depends on missing:
> - util-linux (>= 2.26.2-3)
and util-
5 matches
Mail list logo
