Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-09 Thread Ingo Saitz
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:08:10PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > In this case - Should I copy these libraries to /usr/lib/win32 or > should I select probably more apropriate place like /usr/local/lib > (or even better - I would preffer to use 'stow' package for this - as in > my eyes only the /usr

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-09 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
> >> Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But in this case - maybe downloading script would be legal for Debian ? > > (just like for realplayer ? - or do you think Debian user should never > > see any DivX-ed movie ?) > > Well, AFAICS the installer would cp *.dll /usr/lib/win32/ o

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > I've just placed there the latest version of avifile > (surprisingly the one in CVS is older) > Anyway for now I've used the name of the tar archive so for > the dpkg this archive looks older (0.53-1) > I'm not sure if I should use the release nu

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-08 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Say, could you cite some proof of this? I admit this being hearsay. Before sending my previous message I did try to find some credible source for this information. The Project Mayo doesn't give much info in that direction, and the arti

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-08 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi Zdenek, [ I hope you don't mind me mailing the reply back to d-d, please keep your replies there ] >> Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But in this case - maybe downloading script would be legal for Debian ? > (just like for realplayer ? - or do you think Debian user should nev

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and > I'm surprised noone pointed this out. As far as I can tell, DivX, what > that codecs package contains, is illegal. It started off the Microsoft > DLL

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-08 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi Zdenek, >> Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me, > so there are new packages of this program available here I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and I'm surprised noone pointed th

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Christian Marillat
"ZK" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] ZK> I've just placed there the latest version of avifile ZK> (surprisingly the one in CVS is older) ZK> Anyway for now I've used the name of the tar archive so for ZK> the dpkg this archive looks older (0.53-1) ZK> I'm not sure if I

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
> > On Friday 05 January 2001 07:29, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? > > Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, > > which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for > > it, I reverted to test10. Any

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Brian Almeida
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:29:58AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? > Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, > which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for > it, I reverted to test10. Anyone

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Christian Marillat
"ZK" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ZK> Hi everyone Hi, ZK> After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me, ZK> so there are new packages of this program available here ZK> http://master.debian.org/~kabi/libaviplay_20010103-1_i386.deb ZK> http://mast

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Geert-Jan Van den Bogaerde
On Friday 05 January 2001 07:29, Andres Salomon wrote: > Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? > Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, > which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for > it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Andres Salomon
Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running 2.4.0 could tell you). Thus, it would die immediately for me.

Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-04 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Hi everyone After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me, so there are new packages of this program available here http://master.debian.org/~kabi/libaviplay_20010103-1_i386.deb http://master.debian.org/~kabi/avifile-player_20010103-1_i386.deb http://master.debian.org/~k