Oh, well, it seems the new version was just packaged some days ago, so
this is now a non-issue.
--
Alberto
Itaï BEN YAACOV writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Itaï BEN YAACOV
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: auctex-12
> Version : 12.2
> Upstream Author : GNU Project
> * URL : https://
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Itaï BEN YAACOV
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: auctex-12
Version : 12.2
Upstream Author : GNU Project
* URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/
* License : GPL v3
Description
On 11 Jan 1998, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> ftp://ftp.ci.tuwien.ac.at/pub/export/flpr
Thank you, Ardo!
The URL changed sligtly to:
ftp://ftp.ci.tuwien.ac.at/pub/flpr
Hubert
--
Hubert Weikert DB1MQ Mem
rectory.
>
> The prefered way ist to run dvips in your working directory (e.g. done
> by AuCTeX) and feed the PostScript output to lpd. The command to do this
> is 'dvips -f file.dvi | lpr'.
>
> Regards,
> Hubert
>
> On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Britton wrote:
> &g
directory.
The prefered way ist to run dvips in your working directory (e.g. done
by AuCTeX) and feed the PostScript output to lpd. The command to do this
is 'dvips -f file.dvi | lpr'.
Regards,
Hubert
On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Britton wrote:
> dvips is invoked by magic filter, but the new L
Your right about AucTeX, heck I've used it many times now. We did just
switch LaTeX distributions though didn't we?
> > Btw, if you have ever managed
> > to make dvi files with ps images print right through magicfilter, I would
> > love to hear how you did it.
&
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 03:26:48AM -0900, Britton wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 1998, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
>
> > AucTeX is listed as orphaned in wnpp; I'm willing to take over its
> > maintenance if nobody objects.
>
> I think this might be because teTeX has n
>>>>> "APH" == Adam P Harris.
I've uploaded auctex_9.8i-1 to master: maybe someone could look at it to
see if I've done things the right way.
I put a note in Description telling XEmacs people they don't need to
install it and compiled things with GNU/Em
> I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
> TeX/LaTeX distribution of choice. Of course TeX/LaTeX is so darn
> complicated I'm not really sure about this.
AucTeX is not a TeX distribution but a set of Emacs macros for easier
editing of (La)TeX docu
On 7 Jan 1998, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> AucTeX is listed as orphaned in wnpp; I'm willing to take over its
> maintenance if nobody objects.
I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
TeX/LaTeX distribution of choice. Of course TeX/LaTeX
[Removed CC to ]
[You ("Davide G. M. Salvetti")]
>1) AucTeX has many .el's which should be shipped byte-compiled: should I
>compile them with some specific Emacs flavor or doesn't it matter which
>Emacs I'll use? (Please consider that, AFAIK, XEmacs comes with
Package: auctex
Version: 9.4g-1
Auctex installation fails on a fresh "rex" system as the line
(require 'tex-site.el)
is written to /etc/site-start.el. With emacs-19.34 and the new /etc/emacs/
directory, it should be written to /etc/emacs/site-start.el.
--
Di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 23 Jun 96 22:50 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: auctex
Version: 9.3c-3
Binary: auctex
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
auctex: An integrated environment for writi
"James A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The postinst backgrounds itself. How can you tell if it succeeds or
> > fails ?
> [... (30 to 45 minutes on an old 486 w/ 8 megs RAM) ...]
> Perhaps I should have postinst ask whether or not the .el file should
> be generated? And have a script t
>
> Package: auctex
> Version: 9.2y-7
>
> The postinst backgrounds itself. How can you tell if it succeeds or
> fails ?
The postinst steps through the tex directories and generates .el code
for auc-tex's use. This process can take a long time on slow
machines.
I decide
16 matches
Mail list logo
