On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Something has changed recently in dh_auto_clean that made it skip
> cleaning or ignore cleaning errors when the package was not
> configured. Whether it was on purpose or a bug at the time...
Possibly it was detecting it had alread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 07/10/2013 11:31, Sven Joachim a ←crit :
> On 2013-10-07 10:53 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>
>> I think people who do full archive rebuilds should fix their
>> scripts to not clean before building, or file "wishlist" bugs
>> instead of "serious
On 2013-10-07 10:53 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> I see "serious" FTBFS bugs appearing on my packages when people try to
> rebuild the entire archive.
>
> Those failures are due to attempting to run the clean target prior to
> anything else.
This is what dpkg-buildpackage does, so it has to wor
Running debian/rules clean is the default behaviour of
dpkg-buildpackage and of the buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ibniz&arch=i386&ver=1.18-1&stamp=1380517808
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I see "serious" FTBFS bugs appearing on my packages when people try to
rebuild the entire archive.
Those failures are due to attempting to run the clean target prior to
anything else.
While it's nice when debian/rules clean works even on alrea
5 matches
Mail list logo