Re: Archive architecture qualification

2006-01-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:58:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Possibly doing it on the wiki at a page named something like : > > http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386 > > would be a good way to go. The page is in place for kfreebsd-i386. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aure

Re: Archive architecture qualification

2005-12-31 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:32:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > We'll follow a similar sort of procedure to the release qualification > stuff, starting with an open discussion on #debian-tech on OFTC on Friday > (around 1200 UTC, 2005-12-30) and building up some pages on the wiki. Okay, so we've

Re: Archive architecture qualification

2005-12-30 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-30 10:25]: > > Anyway, that's the general idea; hopefully it'll become clearer > > later. Given release architectures have de-facto requalified, candidates > > for archive (re)qualification are ttbomk: ... > Does this mean that archs not listed (such as a

Re: Archive architecture qualification

2005-12-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:32:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Anyway, that's the general idea; hopefully it'll become clearer > later. Given release architectures have de-facto requalified, candidates > for archive (re)qualification are ttbomk: > > * arm, m68k, s390, sparc > * am

Re: Archive architecture qualification

2005-12-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:32:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: [snip] > Anyway, that's the general idea; hopefully it'll become clearer > later. Given release architectures have de-facto requalified, candidates > for archive (re)qualification are ttbomk: > > * arm, m68k, s390, sparc >