On 03/01/2020 00:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Glib::Object::Introspection->invoke("GLib", undef, "set_prgname",
> "com.example.Test");
I hadn't thought of that!
Up to now, I'd only seen GIO used for gtk, and it didn't occur to me to
try it.
The user has confirmed that this solves the problem
Am Do., 2. Jan. 2020 um 21:58 Uhr schrieb Jeff :
>
> On 02/01/2020 16:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > @Jeff Did your changes include adding a launchable tag? If not, adding
> > one may already fix this issue.
>
> Yes, I had.
>
> > When transitioning:
> > 1) Make sure you add a launchable tag - it m
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 at 22:07:04 +0100, Jeff wrote:
> On 01/01/2020 21:34, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If you're using GLib, check that g_get_prgname() (which defaults to the
> > basename of the executable) is what you want it to be. When using a
> > reversed-domain-name app ID but not using GApplicat
On 01/01/2020 21:34, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Again, any changes to the .desktop filename should happen upstream first.
In this case, I am also upstream. But your point is well made.
> If you're using GLib, check that g_get_prgname() (which defaults to the
> basename of the executable) is what you
On 02/01/2020 16:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> @Jeff Did your changes include adding a launchable tag? If not, adding
> one may already fix this issue.
Yes, I had.
> When transitioning:
> 1) Make sure you add a launchable tag - it may not be essential, but
> it certainly is more explicit. Also, y
Hi everyone!
Sorry for the delayed reply, I was busy with traveling around during
the new year. For that matter: Happy new year! :-)
I am the upstream maintainer of AppStream as well as in Debian.
Am Mi., 1. Jan. 2020 um 13:17 Uhr schrieb Jeff :
>
> Firstly - apologies for sending this to -devel.
On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 at 13:17:34 +0100, Jeff wrote:
> One of my packages is an application and ships a .desktop file and
> appstream xml. The tracker.debian.org page for the package complained
> that the ID for package didn't follow the {tld}.{vendor}.{product}
> scheme[1], so I modified so that it
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 01:17:34PM +0100, Jeff wrote:
> One of my packages is an application and ships a .desktop file and
> appstream xml. The tracker.debian.org page for the package complained
> that the ID for package didn't follow the {tld}.{vendor}.{product}
> scheme[1], so I modified so that
Firstly - apologies for sending this to -devel. Please point me at a
better place to ask the question if there is one.
One of my packages is an application and ships a .desktop file and
appstream xml. The tracker.debian.org page for the package complained
that the ID for package didn't follow the
9 matches
Mail list logo
