t time to rename exim4 to exim?
>> >
>> > Or apache2 to apache?
>>
>> The ASF is responsible for a lot more than httpd now, and is also
>> (gradually) moving away from using the Apache name, so if that package
>> is to be renamed then something like "asf-httpd&qu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Rossi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: uwsgi-apache2-mod
Version : 0.0.1
* URL : https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
On 2023-01-18 Jérémy Lal wrote:
> I just keep on removing apache2 on my system, and find it bad that some
> updates will reinstall it.
> It seems to be coming from dependencies on "apache2 | httpd-cgi" which
> favors the former (I have some httpd-cgi installed, just not apa
Hi,
I just keep on removing apache2 on my system, and find it bad that some
updates will reinstall it.
It seems to be coming from dependencies on "apache2 | httpd-cgi"
which favors the former (I have some httpd-cgi installed, just not apache2).
Is it okay to open bugs asking to use inst
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the mod-mime-xattr package.
Upstream has stopped maintaining this a long time ago, and there are
only few users according to popcon. If there is no interest in it, I
will request a removal.
The package description is:
This is a module for the Ap
certificate support for apache2
This is an apache2 module for obtaining and maintaining certificates
issued by ACME-compatible Certificate Authority such as Let's Encrypt.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)"
* Package name : apache2-mod-xforward
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Adrian Schroeter
* URL : https://github.com/openSUSE/apache2-mod_xforward
* License : Apache-2.0
Programmi
: GSSAPI Authentication module for Apache2
The mod_auth_gssapi module is an authentication service that implements the
SPNEGO based HTTP Authentication protocol defined in RFC4559.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 23 September 2014 17:58, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > Isn't that an implementation detail? Is Python version relevant for the
> > on-the-wire WSGI protocol?
>
> WSGI is an API, not a wire protocol. The Python version of the WSGI
> server would also be the Python version the code is run under, so
At Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:51:56 +0200,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22)
> >On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers <[1]jer...@dekkers.ch> wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
>
Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22)
>On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers <[1]jer...@dekkers.ch> wrote:
>
> As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
> virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
>
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
> virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
> apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a
> working webser
Quoting Brian May (2014-07-30 02:54:10)
> On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers <[1]jer...@dekkers.ch> wrote:
>
> As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
> virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
>
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
> virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
> apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a
> working webser
On 29 July 2014 09:40, Brian May wrote:
> if [ -e /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper ] ; then
> . /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper
> apache2_invoke enconf package.conf
> elif dpkg-query -f '${Version}' -W 'apache2.2-common' >
At Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:29:46 +1000,
Brian May wrote:
>
> On 29 Jul 2014 16:44, "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
> > No, I don't.
> >
> > What brian really wants is apache2 or apache2-bin. In the case of
> > apache2-bin, he needs an additional dependency on l
On 29 July 2014 18:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> No. Use in one shared config file.
> At least that's what I've been told, and what makes sense to me.
>
I wasn't aware of IfVersion. Thanks for the tip.
--
Brian May
Brian May wrote:
>* "apache2-reverse-dependency-calls-invoke-rc.d" - due to legacy fall back
>code that restarts Apache2.2 automatically.
Yeah, I'm overriding this one too.
>* "non-standard-apache2-configuration-name" - due to the fact I need to
>sup
On 29 Jul 2014 16:44, "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
> No, I don't.
>
> What brian really wants is apache2 or apache2-bin. In the case of
> apache2-bin, he needs an additional dependency on libapache2-mod-wsgi.
>
> Really, it should be
>
> apache2 | libapache2-mo
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 08:02:43 schreef Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
> [ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
>
> > Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
> >> So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
> >> insta
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
>[ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
>> Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
>>> So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
>>> installed, but this is not possible.
>> Sure it is.
&g
On 29 July 2014 16:02, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> You surely meant httpd |libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | httpd .
>
>
Not convinced that will work.
e.g. if apache-bin is already installed, that will satisfy the httpd
dependency, so it won't look at libapache2-mod-wsgi.
--
Brian May
[ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
> Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
>> So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
>> installed, but this is not possible.
> Sure it is.
>
> Depends: apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
> So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
> installed, but this is not possible.
Sure it is.
Depends: apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | httpd
is perfectly legal and will do what you want.
--
It is e
On 29 July 2014 09:40, Brian May wrote:
> Fair enough, change that depends to depends on "apache2 | httpd".
>
> However, now when I install it, for reasons I don't understand, apt-get
> prefers to install apache2-bin over apache2 (thought it should default to
> the
following Lintian warning:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/web-application-should-not-depend-unconditionally-on-apache2.html
Fair enough, change that depends to depends on "apache2 | httpd".
However, now when I install it, for reasons I don't understand, apt-get
prefers to install a
ng: C
Description : Apache2 module for authorizing SecurePass users
SecurePass provides web single sign-on through the CAS protocol.
.
This module enhances the Apache authorization features by introducing two
rules to restrict access to the Apache resources:
* the first rule allows only
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libapache2-controller-perl
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Mark Hedges
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~markle/Apache2-Control
server [2] and will remain until the
package is removed from Debian. A new maintainer can contact me to get
an archive of this git tree.
The package description is:
With the use of the suphp setuid root binary (from suphp-common package),
this Apache2 module change the uid of the process executing
> ow...@bugs.debian.org is the place to report this.
>
> Thanks,
>
I just send the mail there, thanks for that info.
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
On 2012-05-25 13:40, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
Hi there,
this Bugreport (see below) seems to break the bts [1]
just for the record.
ow...@bugs.debian.org is the place to report this.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
09:22:18 +0200
Von: Michael Stummvoll
An: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Betreff: /bin/htpasswd exists in apache2-utils ans mini-httpd
Package: mini-httpd,apache2-utils
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
two different binaries with the same name /bin/htpasswd are provided by
apache2 and mini-httpd.
If
: NSS-based SSL module for Apache2
This Apache module provides strong cryptography for the Apache 2.0 webserver
via the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS
v1) protocols by the help of the SSL/TLS implementation library NSS.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for co-maintainers for the apache2 package. The other
co-maintainers are inactive. The package is not in a bad shape, but I am
lacking time and there is significant work to be done in the near future.
The new co-maintainer(s) should of course
Programming Lang: C
Description : An Apache2 module for serving Adobe socket policies.
libapache2-mod-socket-policy-server is an Apache2 module for
serving Adobe socket policies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
sean finney (Fri Sep 16 14:26:19 2011):
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>
> >
> > a) having apache to ignore *.ucf* generally
> > b) just change in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
> > include conf.d/
> >
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>
> a) having apache to ignore *.ucf* generally
> b) just change in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
> include conf.d/
>into
> include conf.d/*.conf
>and ask all packages p
Hello,
I prepared a package which puts some configuration snippet into
/etc/apache2/conf.d. This config snipped is under control of ucf.
Eventually there get's an /etc/apache2/conf.d/XXX.ucf-new file created,
which confuses apache.
I found a bugreport #304785 (4/2005), it's closed, si
=mod_auth_ntlm_winbind
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : apache2 module for NTLM authentication against Winbind
The mod_auth_ntlm_winbind module provides authentication and
authorisation over the web against a Microsoft Windows NT/2000/XP or
Samba Domain Controller
normal setup the insserv would pick whatever boot order
> in wants; when an RT is happened to be configured to run with apache2
> and mysql, its debconf could hint insserv that apache2 now depends on
> mysql booted first to start successfully. Should the user switch her DB
> backe
t; <http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts> which leads me to think that
>> Apache needs something like "Should-Start: $database_server", but this
>> is mainly guessing. I would appreciate input from those familiar with
>> this part of the Debian infrastructure.
>
>
I appear to have utterly failed to proof-read this before sending.
I shouln't attempt mailing list posts at the end of a work day.
Apologies.
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:00:38PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> In other words, although the notion of a sequencing is unlikely
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:50:31PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 22:39:18 Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > * Arrange for database servers to start before Apache
> I wouldn't like that. We would be removing possible parallelism (in a far far
> away future when we would be u
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 22:39:18 Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> * Arrange for database servers to start before Apache
I wouldn't like that. We would be removing possible parallelism (in a far far
away future when we would be using this) at boot.
> * Arrange for RT to be more robust when a connecti
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:17:34PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
>> I'm using RT 3.8 with apache2 via mod_perl, MySQL is used as a database
>> backend. When the server is booted using insserv, apache2 starts
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:17:34PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> I'm using RT 3.8 with apache2 via mod_perl, MySQL is used as a database
> backend. When the server is booted using insserv, apache2 starts long
> before MySQL and for some reason some bit of RT tries to acce
reassign 492532 libaprutil1
fixed 1.3.2+dfsg-1
thanks
apache2 depends on libaprutil1 which depends on libmysqlclient15off which
depends on mysql-common.
This problem will be solved in Lenny+1 by splitting up libaprutil1 into
libaprutil1-{dbd-{mysql,pgsql,sqlite3},ldap}.
Packages that do that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 492532 libaprutil1
Bug#492532: apt-get also removes apache2 when i just wanted to remove
mysql-server
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `libaprutil1'.
> fixed 1.3.2+dfsg-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 492532 general
Bug#492532: apt-get also removes apache2 when i just wanted to remove
mysql-server
Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get'
Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing h
ming Lang: C++
Description : Rails and Rack module for Apache2
Phusion Passenger — a.k.a. mod_rails — makes deployment of
applications built on Ruby on Rails web framework a breeze.
Passenger is an Apache2 module and it's ability to automatically
manage Rails server processes lowers system admin
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the apache2 package.
The package is not in a bad shape, but I just keep up with new bug reports and
haven't been able to actually reduce the bug count for some time. The other
Apache Team members are currently mostly ina
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jack Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mod-atom
Upstream Author : Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mod-atom/
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: C
Description : Apache
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'd like to orphan the libapache2-mod-auth-pam. New maintainer can
choose YADA based package from Debian or CDBS package from Ubuntu.
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
: Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Apache2 module supporting Pubcookie authentication
(Include the long description here.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
She
: GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : OpenID authentication module for Apache2
mod_auth_openid is an authentication module for Apache2.
It handles the functions of an OpenID consumer as specified in the
OpenID 1.1 specification.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061001 22:00]:
> I'll be filing policy- and uninstallability bugs on quite a bunch of
> packages over the next days. If you maintain an apache module which
> does not depend on apache2-common: shame on you, please add a dependency
> on
people want to poke the packages before they're through NEW (which
jvw said he'd try to find time for tomorrow), they are also uploaded to
http://err.no/tmp/a2/
I'll be filing policy- and uninstallability bugs on quite a bunch of
packages over the next days. If you maintain an
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I never build packages outside of pbuilder, so it takes a bit more work
> than that.
I have a similar problem, which I currently workaround as follows:
- bind mount a local APT repository in pbuilder
- copy / symlink only the relevant *.debs from expe
from experimental, and it's
>> a bit annoying to try to get all the pieces lined up properly (a
>> pbuilder with experimental packages, for instance).
> While it's _easier_ to test against unstable, just doing apt-get -t
> experimental install apache2-threaded-dev and t
st unstable, just doing apt-get -t
experimental install apache2-threaded-dev and then building and fixing
your package on your development system doesn't seem like too much to
ask? Just adding experimental to your sources.list does not mean you'll
have any packages from experimental au
Steve Langasek skrev:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I intended to upload last night, but ran out of time due to a) headache
and b) libtool.
I enjoy that you listed libtool separately from the headache ;)
I don't think libtool-induced headache can be lesse
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> They probably want to test-build against apache2 from experimental to
>> fix any source incompatibilities. It has apache2-common, not
>> apache2.2-common, b
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:51:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >>>So can we have apache2.2 uploaded to unstable so that this can happen?
> >>>:-)
> >>Working on it. We are going to
Steve Langasek skrev:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:51:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
So can we have apache2.2 uploaded to unstable so that this can happen? :-)
Working on it. We are going to rename apache2-common to
apache2.2-common and any apache modules must depend on the appropriate
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:51:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >So can we have apache2.2 uploaded to unstable so that this can happen? :-)
> Working on it. We are going to rename apache2-common to
> apache2.2-common and any apache modules must depend on the appropriate
> -c
Steve Langasek skrev:
So can we have apache2.2 uploaded to unstable so that this can happen? :-)
Working on it. We are going to rename apache2-common to
apache2.2-common and any apache modules must depend on the appropriate
-common to ensure they are removed when an incompatible apache is
* Luca Capello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hello!
>
> Cc:ing to d-d to get a wider audience.
>
> Well, I thought the same but then I did a little test (which I'm sorry
> I forgot to mention before):
[...]
> /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php5.load: API module structur
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> > Cc:ing to d-d to get a wider audience.
> > Well, I thought the same but then I did a little test (which I'm sorry
> > I forgot to mention before):
> [...]
> > /etc/apache2/mods-enabled
eeds to be rebuilt in experimental to work with the new
> apache2.
Well, I thought the same but then I did a little test (which I'm sorry
I forgot to mention before):
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg -P libapache2-mod-perl2
(Reading database ... 105871 files and directories currently in
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - When the API becomes incompatible (which would implicitly make the
> > ABI incompatible), both the -dev and library package should increment their
> > numbers.
>
> > - When the ABI becomes incompatible without affecting the API, only
> > the
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're missing the point that sonames track *ABI* changes, and -dev package
> > names should track *API* changes. Typically, upstreams make API changes on
> > new major releases; ABI ch
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're missing the point that sonames track *ABI* changes, and -dev package
> names should track *API* changes. Typically, upstreams make API changes on
> new major releases; ABI changes can happen much more often than this.
> Tracking sonames in your -
Am Sonntag, 28. Mai 2006 00:00 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> and -dev package
> names should track *API* changes
To be more precise: incompatible API changes. If the current API is simply
extended by some new function, the -dev package keeps its numbered name.
HS
pgpwQExhAEWsj.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:14:44AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Odd, because my package depends on libapr0-dev (probably going to be
> > > libapr0-dev | libapr1-dev soon), and an apt-cache search for "0-dev" on my
> > The versionings is when stuff
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Odd, because my package depends on libapr0-dev (probably going to be
> > libapr0-dev | libapr1-dev soon), and an apt-cache search for "0-dev" on my
>
> The versionings is when stuff change to incompatible APIs, so probably
> depending on (libfoo0-dev
On 2006-05-27, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Odd, because my package depends on libapr0-dev (probably going to be
> libapr0-dev | libapr1-dev soon), and an apt-cache search for "0-dev" on my
The versionings is when stuff change to incompatible APIs, so probably
depending on (l
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ondrej,
> > The source package is named mod-bt. It produces the
> > following .deb's:
> >
> > libbttracker0-dev_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
> > libbtutil0-dev_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
> There's no reason to have the so version in the -dev package name.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:32:06PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:07 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > > * Package name: mod-bt
> >
> > I suggest to name your package (you can name just binary package, bu
-1_i386.deb
libapache2-modbt-perl_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbttracker-utils_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbttracker0-dev_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbttracker0_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbtutil-utils_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbtutil0-dev_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libbtutil0_0.0.16-1_i386.deb
libnet-bittorrent-libbt-tracker-perl_0.0.16-1_i386.d
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:07 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> * Package name: mod-bt
I suggest to name your package (you can name just binary package, but it
since you are building just one binary package, it's easier to rename
source package as well) as libapache-mod-bt to follow common practic
ming Lang: C, language bindings in PHP and Perl
Description : BitTorrent tracker for the Apache2 web server
mod_bt is a BitTorrent tracker for the Apache Web server. It is written in C
and runs as an Apache 2.x module. It is possible for mod_perl or PHP to
directly access the tracker's inf
On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> [..]
> >>> A lot of those bugs are quite old and some appear to be trivial to
> >>> fix, but they don't have a single response fro
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
[..]
>>> A lot of those bugs are quite old and some appear to be trivial to
>>> fix, but they don't have a single response from you.
>>> Could you please tell why?
>> Most likely because the
On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Hi Debian developers,
> >
> > Does any of you know about the status of Apache2?
>
> It works flawlessly on several places where I have deployed it.
>
> > I've send the
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi Debian developers,
>
> Does any of you know about the status of Apache2?
It works flawlessly on several places where I have deployed it.
> I've send the message below to listed email address and I've asked at
> IRC but I haven't recei
Hi Debian developers,
Does any of you know about the status of Apache2?
I've send the message below to listed email address and I've asked at
IRC but I haven't received any response.
Hi Apache2 maintainers,
I've noticed there are a lot of bugs, see
http://bugs.debian.org/c
ction application/x-httpd-fastphp5 /fcgi-bin/php5-cgi
And yet apache2 doesn't want to connect to the -host host, instead it
launches the binary mentioned in Action and uses it to handle the requests.
Maybe I'm reading the docs incorrectly
(http://www.fastcgi.com/mod_fastcgi/docs/m
ud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://eloise.ouvaton.net/%7earch/archzoom.cgi/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/mod-hash2--main--1.0
> * License : GPL
> Description : apache2 module which provides a good way to hash
> servername
>
> mod_hash2 build a digest from
-hash2--main--1.0
* License : GPL
Description : apache2 module which provides a good way to hash servername
mod_hash2 build a digest from the servername to create a united
directory scheme. As digest could collide, mod_hash2 add the
real servername to distinguish between hash valu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apache2-redirtoservname
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hogyros.de/misc
* License : GPL + exception to allow linking against Apache
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mod-proxy-html
Version : 2.4.1
Upstream Author : Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/
* License : GPL
Description : Apache2 filter module for HTML links rew
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libapache2-mod-auth-pam
Version : 1.1.1
* URL : http://pam.sourceforge.net/mod_auth_pam/
* License : Apache
Description : module for Apache2 which authenticate using
Are there any plans for php support for apache2? I've played around w/
2.0.40 and a php cvs snapshot from sometime last week, w/ good results;
I'm looking forward to a php4-snapshot/php4-apache2 packages, or
something along those lines.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Thom
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:12:55PM +0100, Matt Kern wrote:
> I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration
> directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits together. I
> understand the include mechanism and most of the files under
> /etc/apache2, but where are the
* Matt Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I have just installed apache2 (out of sid onto a woody based system)
> and am having a little trouble understanding the new methodology.
>
> I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration
> directories, but cannot see quite how
I have just installed apache2 (out of sid onto a woody based system)
and am having a little trouble understanding the new methodology.
I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration
directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits together. I
understand the include mechanism and
* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> > Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be ba
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
> will add a provides for apache2-modules. We scr
* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > As those of you who read slashdot know, Apache 2.0 was released last night.
> > deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./
>
> Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
>
>
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> As those of you who read slashdot know, Apache 2.0 was released last night.
> deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./
Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
2) Why is apache2 compi
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
