Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Li, Yan schrieb: > Mike: >> Why not put a lintian override ? Your explanation sounds like a good >> reason to me. > > Thank you. I'm contacting Lintian maintainers. You have to set and install your own lintian overrides in your package in the .lintia

Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Li, Yan
Mike: > Why not put a lintian override ? Your explanation sounds like a good > reason to me. Thank you. I'm contacting Lintian maintainers. -- Li, Yan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:17:57PM +0800, Li, Yan wrote: > Dear List, > > I'm facing an issue when packaging the Anjal [1] mail client for > Debian. > > Anjal is another GUI front-end for Evolution designed for small form > factor devices. So naturally Anjal depends upon many .so libraries in > t

Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Li, Yan
Dear List, I'm facing an issue when packaging the Anjal [1] mail client for Debian. Anjal is another GUI front-end for Evolution designed for small form factor devices. So naturally Anjal depends upon many .so libraries in the Evolution package. But those .so libraries is considered private by Ev