Re: Adding init.d dependencies mostly done, next step is testing

[Lucas Nussbaum] >> updated to document that such headers should be included, and a text > ^^ must? I am all for requiring it, yes. :) >> It would be useful to check >> automatically all init.d scripts in the archive for dependency loops, >> perhaps reg

Re: Adding init.d dependencies mostly done, next step is testing (Was: Dependency based boot sequencing reaches 2/3 threshold)

On 09/04/08 at 11:26 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Now the dependency information in the scripts need to be tested and > used to detect errors in them. Also, the Debian policy should be > updated to document that such headers should be included, and a text

Adding init.d dependencies mostly done, next step is testing (Was: Dependency based boot sequencing reaches 2/3 threshold)

I am happy to report that another mile stone for the release goal of making it possible to enable dependency based boot sequencing is reached. 98% of all packages with init.d scripts now have dependency information in Sid. Most of the remaining 17 packages are being removed from the archive, and